Experiences of bureaucracy in courts have been a bit controversial in previous research. There are contradictions about how bureaucratised the courts are in Sweden and what the consequences are. On the other hand, is bureaucracy claimed to run the risk of unethical proposals being made and the official to prevent it, but on the other hand that the courts are not bureaucratic but rather superfluous. Another study is for bureaucracy where it is considered that unclear regulations makes the work difficult. The study is intended to investigate further what it looks like in the district Court of Sweden, in order to provide a perspective on how the officials themselves experience it, in order to increase the understanding of what the organizational form should be. Since there are contradictions, it is interesting to investigate it.