The purpose of this Masters thesis is to examine the debate concerning Agnes von Krusenstjernas Fröknarna von Pahlen-novels from a ideological analytic perspective. This debate came to be called The Krusenstjerna feud Krusenstjernafejden and was most intensive in the years 1934-35 after Porten vid Johannes and Älskande par had been published. We examine 8 articles using a text analytic method. We have limited ourselves to public material that is available in Swedish press and Swedish magazines. Our ambition is, through this, to determine the articles authors political point of view and ideas of preference. In doing so, we wish to see which societal conflicts the debate about Krusenstjerna expressed. Since the ideological analyses include an investigation of the context in society, the theory fits our investigation well. Our analysis focuses on two aspects of the context in society which had a large impact upon the cultural climate of the 30s. These aspects are sexual politics and nazism. We see how these aspects characterize the point of views which are expressed in the articles. Throughout our analysis, a picture of a society in change is getting clearer, where things like equal rights for women and workers threatens the present patriarchal structure. Put simply one could say that the conservatives were pitted against the radicals, since the radicals praised the liberal bluntness of Krusenstjernas novels, while the conservatives considered this openness a menace to society. In our analysis a more elaborate image is given than the most common way this debate is described. For instance it was not always the radicals who sided with Krusenstjernas way of describing. A writer can be both for and against Krusenstjernas novels. At a first look it can thus be hard to see what their actual point of view is. Through our ideological analysis the articles are put more in focus since the backgrounds of the writers positions are made clear.