3435363738394037 of 160
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Registered nurse–patient communication and decision-making in primary care consultations: a scoping review
University of Borås, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4204-1308
University of Borås, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare. The Swedish Red Cross University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9194-3244
University of Borås, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0530-9408
University of Borås, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9383-0227
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: BMC Nursing, E-ISSN 1472-6955, Vol. 25, article id 562Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background

Internationally, interest in the expanding role of registered nurse–led consultations in primary care is increasing. This role requires effective communication to support triage and clinical decision-making. While physician‒patient communication has been extensively studied, research on registered nurse‒patient communication remains limited, particularly in primary care. Therefore, the aim of this scoping review was to map and describe how registered nurse–patient communication and decision-making in primary care consultations are characterised in the existing literature, based on observations of clinical practice.

Methods

This scoping review included a systematic literature search conducted in March 2025 in the PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science and Scopus databases. A total of 12,066 records were identified and screened. The review followed the methodological framework of Arksey and O’Malley and adhered to the PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines.

Results

A total of 16 studies were included. Registered nurse‒patient communication was observed using audio- and video-recorded observations and participant observations during telephone consultations (n = 5), chronic disease management consultations (n = 3), mental health consultations (n = 1) and walk-in clinic consultations (n = 7). Findings on communication and decision-making were organised into four themes related to the key characteristics of exploring patients’ concerns, observing and assessing patients’ health status, tailoring communication, and facilitating decision-making with patients.

Conclusion

The findings indicate that registered nurses use various communication skills during different phases of consultations. However, comprehensive studies on registered nurse–patient communication and decision-making in primary care are lacking. This highlights the need for future in-depth and comprehensive studies on registered nurse–patient communication in primary care to inform both clinical practices and nursing education.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2026. Vol. 25, article id 562
Keywords [en]
Communication, Consultation, Decision-making, Interaction, Primary care nursing, Primary health care, Registered nurse, Scoping review
National Category
Nursing
Research subject
The Human Perspective in Care
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-35878DOI: 10.1186/s12912-026-04937-wISI: 001804236800001PubMedID: 42337608Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105043216698OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-35878DiVA, id: diva2:2083971
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2022–00850Available from: 2026-07-03 Created: 2026-07-03 Last updated: 2026-07-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1375 kB)22 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1375 kBChecksum SHA-512
1e6b441b081abaf8dc120f7fddb7e82a17e7b17f06fde1843a58362a6e7c8809abd5565202f8c8c806524bb422199c6f4e4e708df09998d2a284d5453b329390
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Östensson, SofiaSundler, Annelie JohanssonBergman, KarinDarcy, LauraSaarnio Huttu, LottaHedén, Lena

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Östensson, SofiaSundler, Annelie JohanssonBergman, KarinDarcy, LauraSaarnio Huttu, LottaHedén, LenaVan Dulmen, SandraHolmström, Inger K.Östman, Malin
By organisation
Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare
In the same journal
BMC Nursing
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 79 hits
3435363738394037 of 160
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf