2930313233343532 of 43
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Stakeholder Perspectives on Cancer Survivors’ Return to Work and Well-Being: Qualitative Interview Study
University of Borås, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare. Department of Caring Science, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, University of Gävle, Gävle, Gävleborg, Sweden . (SOLWE)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3325-4184
Centre for Research and Development, Region Gävleborg, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Occupational Health, Psychology and Sports Sciences, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, University of Gävle, Gävle, Gävleborg, Sweden; Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6067-3520
Department of Caring Science, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, University of Gävle, Gävle, Gävleborg, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3668-3857
Department of Caring Science, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, University of Gävle, Gävle, Gävleborg, Sweden; Center for Clinical Research Dalarna, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Occupational Therapy and Healthcare Counselling, Region Dalarna, Ludvika, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0009-0004-1483-3254
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: JMIR Cancer, E-ISSN 2369-1999, Vol. 12, article id e89954Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Sustainable development
According to the author(s), the content of this publication falls within the area of sustainable development.
Abstract [en]

Background: About 4 in 10 people in Sweden get cancer during their lifetime, and approximately half of them will be diagnosed during their working life. As cancer survival rates improve, a growing number of individuals face challenges in returning to work following treatment. This increases the demand for effective return-to-work (RTW) strategies. Despite existing rehabilitation frameworks, cancer survivors often encounter barriers to sustainable work reintegration.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate stakeholders’ perceptions of facilitators and barriers to RTW among cancer survivors, including factors promoting work-related well-being during the RTW process.

Methods: During the development phase of a work-oriented rehabilitation intervention, semistructured interviews were conducted, with 25 stakeholders involved in the RTW process: health care professionals (n=12), social insurance officers (n=7), employers (n=5), and an employment service agency officer (n=1). Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

Results: Five overarching themes were identified that influenced RTW: collaboration and clear division of responsibilities, balancing individual adaptations, reducing structural barriers through support, views and expectations of the individual regarding RTW, and the emotional significance of work. Key facilitators included flexible work arrangements, individualized adaptations, a strong desire to work, and the emotional value of work. Barriers comprised lack of collaboration among stakeholders, particularly the absence of a clear division of responsibilities, as well as structural barriers, such as sick leave bureaucracy and financial obstacles. The role of rehabilitation coordinators was highlighted as pivotal in bridging gaps between stakeholders and ensuring continuity in care.

Conclusions: RTW for cancer survivors is a complex, multifactorial process requiring coordinated efforts across health care, insurance, and employment sectors. Enhancing collaboration, clarifying stakeholder responsibilities, and implementing flexible, individualized support structures are essential to facilitating cancer survivors’ RTW. Additionally, including a designated coordinator in the process is proposed. More support during the early phase of RTW is necessary to reduce the risk of long-term labor market exclusion. To help cancer survivors’ RTW, clear role definitions and shared responsibilities among stakeholders are essential. Flexibility in the RTW process helps individuals reintegrate at their own pace, reduces isolation, and promotes social connection. These are key considerations for future policies and support measures.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
JMIR Publications, 2026. Vol. 12, article id e89954
Keywords [en]
cancer survivors, rehabilitation, return to work, sickness absence, work participation
National Category
Nursing
Research subject
The Human Perspective in Care
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-35629DOI: 10.2196/89954ISI: 001765933300001PubMedID: 42114136OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-35629DiVA, id: diva2:2060187
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2021-01546Available from: 2026-05-15 Created: 2026-05-15 Last updated: 2026-05-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(277 kB)8 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 277 kBChecksum SHA-512
ac01bb302a1d5452ae002c821c6f868ed00f79c4d0d75c8ab4c226440153c406781ffcfde128d692ac7cfa6bbab4fa03a69054fae92a1204cdc27ca73b363815
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Fallman, Sara L.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fallman, Sara L.Wijk, KatarinaEfverman, AnnaEklund, LindaFessé, PerTrygged, SvenFjell, Maria
By organisation
Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare
In the same journal
JMIR Cancer
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 191 hits
2930313233343532 of 43
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf