3132333435363734 of 43
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Doing Ethics Work in Digitalised Welfare: How Discretion and Judgement Are Reconfigured in Everyday Practice
University of Borås, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare. University of Borås, Faculty of Textiles, Engineering and Business.
School of Social Work, Lund University, Lund Sweden.
School of Learning, Humanities and Social Sciences, Halmstad University, Halmstad Sweden.
2026 (English)In: Social Policy & Administration, ISSN 0144-5596, E-ISSN 1467-9515Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

This article investigates how social workers enact ethical judgement in digitalised welfare organisations. Drawing on the concept of ethics work, it examines how engagements with digital systems involve ongoing processes of identifying, interpreting and responding to ethically salient aspects of practice. The study is based on an organisational ethnography in Swedish social services, combining 45 interviews with social workers and approximately 200 h of shadowing in child and family services and economic assistance units. The analysis focuses on situations where digital systems generate frictions, ambiguities or risks for clients and explores how practitioners discern what is at stake and adjust, supplement or bypass digital routines. The findings show that discretionary responses to digital friction constitute important sites of ethics work. Digitalization introduces new conditions under which ethics work unfolds: ethical concerns are increasingly triggered by system logics embedded in digital systems and practitioners enact responsibility by interpreting system outputs and mitigating unintended consequences for clients. Rather than replacing traditional forms of ethical judgement, digital systems reconfigure when and how ethics work is enacted in everyday welfare practice.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2026.
National Category
Social Work
Research subject
The Human Perspective in Care; Business and IT
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-35626DOI: 10.1111/spol.70072ISI: 001757546600001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105038136064OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-35626DiVA, id: diva2:2059981
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2022‐00288Available from: 2026-05-13 Created: 2026-05-13 Last updated: 2026-05-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(236 kB)20 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 236 kBChecksum SHA-512
a6de42d5619edc71625337228aded5f5bd832e41b7d3c1a83ab0d95b522f5c6645488a1c39c6f2578837107b13800dfb8c9511083c7465311bec6400a5e969a6
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Carlsson, Julia Sofia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Carlsson, Julia Sofia
By organisation
Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social WelfareFaculty of Textiles, Engineering and Business
In the same journal
Social Policy & Administration
Social Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 220 hits
3132333435363734 of 43
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf