2021222324252623 of 33
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Significant room for improvement in the prehospital assessment and treatment of acute abdominal pain: a retrospective observational study
Center for Research and Development, Region Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden.
University of Borås, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare. Department of Prehospital Emergency Care, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Center for Prehospital Research, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden. (PreHospen)
University of Borås, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare. (PreHospen)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4139-6235
Linköpings universitet, Avdelningen för kirurgi, ortopedi och onkologi.
2025 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, E-ISSN 1757-7241, Vol. 33, no 1, article id 12Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background

Acute abdominal pain (AAP) is a common reason for calling emergency medical services (EMS). Despite the widely acknowledged importance of effective prehospital pain management, described by patients as crucial regardless of any other factor, studies on prehospital pain management in AAP patients are limited and suggest room for improvement. This is particularly relevant given the long-standing controversy surrounding the use of analgesia in AAP patients before a final diagnosis is made, which may still influence the prehospital pain management.

 

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of pain management in EMS patients with AAP in a central Swedish region. The region had a population density of 15.7 inhabitants per square kilometer spread over a mix of small urban and rural settings. Patient records were manually reviewed and scanned for written assessments or numeric ratings of pain. The analysis focused on proportions of assessment, treatment and reassessment of pain as well as median pain intensity, pain reduction and proportion of patients with a low last recording of pain.

 

Results

816 patients were included. Pain was assessed in 55% (n = 447) of all cases. The median initial pain intensity was eight units (IQR 6.0–9.0) on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and 90% (n = 403) of the assessed patients experienced moderate or severe pain. Of those, 62% (n = 249) received pharmacological treatment. In 50% (n = 158) of all cases receiving treatment, pain was reassessed afterwards. The median pain reduction was four units (IQR 2.0–5.0) on the NRS scale. Among all cases, 10% (n = 84) had a last recorded pain assessment indicating low pain.

 

Conclusions

Significant room for improvement in the prehospital management of acute abdominal pain was found. The proportions of pain assessment, treatment and reassessment were low with nine out of ten patients leaving prehospital care with unknown, moderate or severe pain. Among the cases where pain assessment, treatment and reassessment were made and recorded, four out of five patients experienced significant pain relief, indicating the potential of better prehospital pain management.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2025. Vol. 33, no 1, article id 12
Keywords [en]
Emergency medical services, Abdominal pain, Pain management, Pain measurement, Acute pain, Pain
National Category
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Research subject
The Human Perspective in Care
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-34530DOI: 10.1186/s13049-025-01328-zISI: 001406639900001PubMedID: 39871387Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85217188890OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-34530DiVA, id: diva2:2010211
Available from: 2025-10-30 Created: 2025-10-30 Last updated: 2025-10-30

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1174 kB)13 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1174 kBChecksum SHA-512
bdc93157128d74b8403db64461cda91acf3ef425b903a18daa16537d7929a1be67c16bd88cc971bd8daf7c31680726b59794933a25032a83ddb2dcbc4127d66f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Herlitz, Johan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Herlitz, Johan
By organisation
Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 187 hits
2021222324252623 of 33
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf