Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Measuring women’s experiences of decision-making and aspects of midwifery support: a confirmatory factor analysis ofthe revised Childbirth Experience Questionnaire
Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg.
Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg.
Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg.
Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg.
Vise andre og tillknytning
2020 (engelsk)Inngår i: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, ISSN 1471-2393, E-ISSN 1471-2393, BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthArtikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Women’s experiences of labour and birth can have both short- and long-term effects on theirphysical and psychological health. The original Swedish version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) has shown to have good psychometric quality and ability to differentiate between groups known to differ inchildbirth experience. Two subscales were revised in order to include new items with more relevant content aboutdecision-making and aspects of midwifery support. The aim of the study was to develop new items in twosubscales and to test construct validity and reliability of the revised version of CEQ, called CEQ2.

Method: A total of 11 new items (Professional Support and Participation) and 14 original items from the first CEQ(Own capacity and Perceived safety), were answered by 682 women with spontaneous onset of labour. Confirmatoryfactor analysis was used to analyse model fit.

Results: The hypothesised four-factor model showed good fit (CMIN = 2.79; RMR = 0.33; GFI = 0.94; CFI = 0.94; TLI =0.93; RMSEA = 0.054 and PCLOSE = 0.12) Cronbach’s alpha was good for all subscales (0.82, 0.83, 0.76 and 0.73) andfor the total scale (0.91).

Conclusions: CEQ2, like the first CEQ, yields four important aspects of experience during labour and birth showinggood psychometric performance, including decision-making and aspects of midwifery support, in both primiparousand multiparous women.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2020.
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Människan i vården
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-23258DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-02869-0ISI: 000525266300004Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85083072408OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-23258DiVA, id: diva2:1436903
Tilgjengelig fra: 2020-06-08 Laget: 2020-06-08 Sist oppdatert: 2025-09-24bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Person

Nilsson, Christina

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Nilsson, Christina
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 294 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf