Ändra sökning
Avgränsa sökresultatet
1 - 45 av 45
RefereraExporteraLänk till träfflistan
Permanent länk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Träffar per sida
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sortering
  • Standard (Relevans)
  • Författare A-Ö
  • Författare Ö-A
  • Titel A-Ö
  • Titel Ö-A
  • Publikationstyp A-Ö
  • Publikationstyp Ö-A
  • Äldst först
  • Nyast först
  • Skapad (Äldst först)
  • Skapad (Nyast först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Äldst först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Nyast först)
  • Disputationsdatum (tidigaste först)
  • Disputationsdatum (senaste först)
  • Standard (Relevans)
  • Författare A-Ö
  • Författare Ö-A
  • Titel A-Ö
  • Titel Ö-A
  • Publikationstyp A-Ö
  • Publikationstyp Ö-A
  • Äldst först
  • Nyast först
  • Skapad (Äldst först)
  • Skapad (Nyast först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Äldst först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Nyast först)
  • Disputationsdatum (tidigaste först)
  • Disputationsdatum (senaste först)
Markera
Maxantalet träffar du kan exportera från sökgränssnittet är 250. Vid större uttag använd dig av utsökningar.
  • 1.
    Andersen, Jens Peter
    et al.
    Aarhus University.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Institutionen för ABM, Uppsala Universitet.
    Price revisited: on the growth of dissertations in eight research fields2011Ingår i: Scientometrics, ISSN 0138-9130, E-ISSN 1588-2861, Vol. 88, nr 2, s. 371-383Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    This paper studies the production of dissertations in eight research fields in thenatural sciences, the social sciences and the humanities. In using doctoral dissertations itbuilds on De Solla Prices seminal study which used PhD dissertations as one of severalindicators of scientific growth (Price, Little science, big science, 1963). Data from theProQuest: Dissertations and Theses database covering the years 1950–2007 are used todepict historical trends, and the Gompertz function was used for analysing the data. Adecline in the growth of dissertations can be seen in all fields in the mid-eighties andseveral fields show only a modest growth during the entire period. The growth profiles ofspecific disciplines could not be explained by traditional dichotomies such as pure/appliedor soft/hard, but rather it seems that the age of the discipline appears to be an importantfactor. Thus, it is obvious that the growth of dissertations must be explained using severalfactors emerging both inside and outside academia. Consequently, we propose that theoutput of dissertations can be used as an indicator of growth, especially in fields like thehumanities, where journal or article counts are less applicable.

  • 2.
    Björn, Hammarfelt
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    It is all about the infrastructure: Review of Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner, Reflexive Inertia: Reinventing Scholarship Through Digital Practices2015Ingår i: Human IT, Vol. 13, nr 2, s. 330-333Artikel, recension (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 3.
    de Rijcke, Sarah
    et al.
    CWTS, Leiden University.
    Wouters, Paul
    CWTS, Leiden University.
    Rushforth, Alex
    CWTS, Leiden University.
    Fransson, Thomas
    CWTS, Leiden University.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use: a literature review2016Ingår i: Research Evaluation, ISSN 0958-2029, E-ISSN 1471-5449, Vol. 25, nr 2, s. 1-9Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    This review of the international literature on evaluation systems, evaluation practices, and metrics (mis)uses was written as part of a larger review commissioned by the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) to inform their independent assessment of the role of metrics in research evaluation (2014–5). The literature on evaluation systems, practices, and effects of indicator uses is extremely heterogeneous: it comprises hundreds of sources published in different media, spread over disciplines, and with considerable variation in the nature of the evidence. A condensation of the state-of-the-art in relevant research is therefore highly timely. Our reviewpresents the main strands in the literature, with a focus on empirical materials about possible effects of evaluation exercises, ‘gaming’ of indicators, and strategic responses by scientific communities and others to requirements in research assessments. In order to increase visibility and availability, an adapted and updated review is presented here as a stand-alone—after authorizationby HEFCE.

  • 4.
    Haddow, Gabrielle
    et al.
    Curtin University.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT. University of Borås.
    Early career academics and evaluative metrics:: ambivalence, resistance and strategies2019Ingår i: The Social Structures of Global Academia / [ed] Fabian Cannizzo & Nick Osbaldiston, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2019, s. 125-143Kapitel i bok, del av antologi (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    Measures of research productivity and quality are key components of academic life, and a successful academic career is heavily dependent on meeting quantified performance standards. For many years citation-based measures like the Impact Factor dominated the metrics landscape, but in the last two decades a swathe of new evaluation tools have emerged, including the h-index, ranked journal lists, and altmetrics. While the effectiveness of these metrics is debatable across many disciplines, their use in the social sciences and humanities has attracted most criticism. This chapter is concerned with how early career academics are using and responding to evaluative metrics; their strategies and ambitions for the future, and their perceptions of how evaluative metrics influence their work. In-depth interviews with Australian academics in the social sciences and humanities allowed us to explore these questions and we are particularly interested in how competing ‘orders of worth’ come to the fore in these accounts, and how researchers negotiate rivalling demands and expectations. Drawing on Brandtner’s concept of ‘evaluative landscapes’, we suggest that metrics and indicators can be seen as signposts which are used to assess achievement and to navigate a pathway to an ‘idealised sense of self’.

  • 5.
    Haddow, Gaby
    et al.
    Curtin University.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Quality, impact, and quantification: Indicators and metrics use by social scientists2019Ingår i: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, ISSN 2330-1635, E-ISSN 2330-1643, Vol. 70, nr 1, s. 16-26Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    The use of indicators and metrics for research evaluation purposes is well‐documented; however, less is known about their use by individual scholars. With a focus on the social sciences, this article contributes to the existing literature on indicators and metrics use in fields with diverse publication practices. Scholars in Australia and Sweden were asked about their use and reasons for using metrics. A total of 581 completed surveys were analyzed to generate descriptive statistics, with textual analysis performed on comments provided to open questions. While just under half of the participant group had used metrics, the Australians reported use in twice the proportion of their Swedish peers. Institutional policies and processes were frequently associated with use, and the scholars' comments suggest a high level of awareness of some metrics as well as strategic behavior in demonstrating research performance. There is also evidence of tensions between scholars' research evaluation environment and their disciplinary values and publication practices.

  • 6.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Institutionen för ABM, Uppsala Universitet.
    An examination of the possibilities that altmetric methods offer in the case of the humanities2013Ingår i: Proceedings of the ISSI 2013 – 14th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics / [ed] Juan Gorraiz, Edgar Schiebel, Christian Gumpenberger, Marianne Hörlesberger & Henk Moed, 2013, s. 721-727Konferensbidrag (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    The advantages of altmetrics — the diversity of dissemination channels analysed, the speed of getting data, the openness of methods, and the ability to measure impact beyond the ‘scholarly realm’— could be seen as especially promising for fields that currently are difficult to study using established bibliometric methods and data sources. This paper reviews the benefits of using altmetric methods to analyse the impact of research in the humanities and tests some of the most common altmetric tools on a small sample of publications and authors. The findings indicate that many of the problems identified in research on the use of bibliometrics on the humanities are also relevant for altmetric approaches. The importance of non-journal publications, the reliance on print as well the limited availability of open access publishers are characteristics that hinder altmetric analysis. However, this study provides only a few examples and further studies are needed in order to examine the possibilities that altmetric methods offer.

  • 7.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Beyond coverage: Toward a bibliometrics for the humanities2016Ingår i: Research Assessment in the humanities: Towards criteria and procedures / [ed] Michael Oshsner, Sven E. Hug & Hans-Dieter Daniel, Springer, 2016, s. 115-131Kapitel i bok, del av antologi (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

     In this chapter, the possibility of using bibliometric measures for

    evaluating research in the humanities is pondered. A review of recent attempts to

    develop bibliometric methods for studying the humanities shows that organizational,

    epistemological differences as well as distinct research practices in research fields

    ought to be considered. The dependence on colleagues, interdisciplinarity and the

    ‘rural’ nature of research in many humanistic disciplines are identified as factors

    that influence the possibilities of applying bibliometric methods. A few particularly

    promising approaches are highlighted, and the possibility of developing a ‘bibliometrics

    for the humanities’ is examined. Finally, the intellectual characteristics of

    specific disciplines should be considered when quality indicators are constructed, and

    the importance of including scholars from the humanities in the process is stressed.

  • 8.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Institutionen för ABM, Uppsala Universitet.
    Citation analysis on the micro-level: The example of Walter Benjamin’s Illuminations2011Ingår i: Journal of The American Society For Information Science And Technology, ISSN 1532-2882, E-ISSN 1532-2890, Vol. 62, nr 5, s. 819-830Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    This article employs citation analysis on a micro level—the level of the cited document; in this case, WalterBenjamin’s Illuminations (1968/2007). The study showshow this frequently cited publication—more than 4,000citations in Web of Science—has been received. Thegrowth of citations and interdisciplinary citing is studied,and a novel approach—page citation analysis—is appliedto study how different parts of Illuminations have beencited.The article demonstrates howbibliometric methodscan be used together with qualitative accounts to mapthe impact and dissemination of a particular publication.Furthermore, it shows how bibliometric methods can beutilized to study intellectual structures in the humanities,and highlights the influence of the humanities onthe social sciences and sciences.

  • 9.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Discipline2019Ingår i: ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge OrganizationArtikel, forskningsöversikt (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    Discipline is commonly used to denote particular areas of knowledge, research and education. Yet, the concept is often not very well defined or even explicitly discussed when used in knowledge organization and related fields. The aim of this article is to encourage and facilitate further reflections on academic disciplines, while at the same time offering insights on how this elusive concept might be understood. An overarching argument is that discipline should foremost be understood in relation to institutional and organizational features and this is what distinguishes it from related terms such as, fielddomain or topic. The paper reviews the etymology and history of the concept, it discusses attempts to define and conceptualise disciplines and it offers insights on how disciplines can be studied. Regardless of our views of disciplines, either as inherently out-dated constructs or as important features of a well-functioning academia, it is concluded that further precision or care in explicating the concept is needed.

  • 10.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Uppsala universitet, Institutionen för ABM.
    Following the Footnotes: A Bibliometric Analysis of Citation Patterns in Literary Studies2012Doktorsavhandling, sammanläggning (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
    Abstract [en]

    This thesis provides an in-depth study of the possibilities of applying bibliometric methods to the research field of literary studies. The four articles that constitute the backbone of this thesis focus on different aspects of references and citations in literary studies: from the use of references in the text to citation patterns among 34 literature journals. The analysis covers both an Anglo-Saxon context as well as research in Swedish literary studies, and the materials used include Web of Science data, references in the Swedish literature journal TFL (Tidskrift för Litteraturvetenskap) and applications to the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet). A study is also made of the influence of one single publication—Walter Benjamin’s Illuminations—and its impact in literary studies and in wider academia.

    The results from the four articles are elaborated upon using a theoretical framework that focuses on differences in the social and intellectual organization of research fields. According to these theories literary studies can be described as a fragmented, heterogenic, interdisciplinary and ‘rural’ field with a diverse audience. The fragmented and rural organization of the field is reflected in low citation frequencies as well as in the difficulties in discerning research specialities in co-citation mappings, while the analysis of the intellectual base (highly cited authors) is an example of the heterogenic and interdisciplinary character of the field, as it includes authors from many fields across the humanities and the social sciences.

    The thesis emphasizes that bibliometric studies of research fields in the humanities need to incorporate non-English and non-journal publications in order to produce valid and fair results. Moreover, bibliometric methods must be modified in accordance with the organization of research in a particular field, and differences in referencing practices and citation patterns ought to be considered. Consequently, it is advised that bibliometric measures for evaluating research in these fields should, if used at all, be applied with great caution.

  • 11.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Department of ALM, Uppsala University.
    Following the Footnotes: A Bibliometric Analysis of Citation Patterns in Literary Studies2012Doktorsavhandling, sammanläggning (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
    Abstract [en]

    Hammarfelt, B. 2012. Following the Footnotes: A Bibliometric Analysis of Citation Patterns in Literary Studies. Department of ALM. Skrifter utgivna av Institutionen för ABM vid Uppsala universitet 5. 193 pp. Uppsala. ISBN 978-91-506-2279-9.

    This thesis provides an in-depth study of the possibilities of applying bibliometric methods to the research field of literary studies. The four articles that constitute the backbone of this thesis focus on different aspects of references and citations in literary studies: from the use of references in the text to citation patterns among 34 literature journals. The analysis covers both an Anglo-Saxon context as well as research in Swedish literary studies, and the materials used include Web of Science data, references in the Swedish literature journal TFL (Tidskrift för Litteraturvetenskap) and applications to the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet). A study is also made of the influence of one single publication—Walter Benjamin’s Illuminations—and its impact in literary studies and in wider academia. The results from the four articles are elaborated upon using a theoretical framework that focuses on differences in the social and intellectual organization of research fields. According to these theories literary studies can be described as a fragmented, heterogenic, interdisciplinary and ‘rural’ field with a diverse audience. The fragmented and rural organization of the field is reflected in low citation frequencies as well as in the difficulties in discerning research specialities in co-citation mappings, while the analysis of the intellectual base (highly cited authors) is an example of the heterogenic and interdisciplinary character of the field, as it includes authors from many fields across the humanities and the social sciences. The thesis emphasizes that bibliometric studies of research fields in the humanities need to incorporate non-English and non-journal publications in order to produce valid and fair results. Moreover, bibliometric methods must be modified in accordance with the organization of research in a particular field, and differences in referencing practices and citation patterns ought to be considered. Consequently, it is advised that bibliometric measures for evaluating research in these fields should, if used at all, be applied with great caution.

  • 12.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Four Claims on Research Assessment and Metric Use in the Humanities2017Ingår i: Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, ISSN 1931-6550, E-ISSN 1550-8366, Vol. 43, nr 5, s. 33-38Artikel i tidskrift (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
    Abstract [en]

    Bibliometric evaluation for research in the field of sciences can be a good way toassess the quality and factual basis of claims and can lead to more funding forauthors and for research work. However, due to the more diverse fields covered, thistype of evaluation is less effective in the world of humanities. Many professionalsand researchers in humanities fields believe that bibliometric evaluation is meantonly for STEM research and can’t properly assess any findings made in humanities.Four common claims made about bibliometrics in humanities are that bibliometricsdo not adequately cover the non-uniform nature of humanities; greater bibliometriccoverage will not solve all the research problems in humanities subjects; metrics usealready has an impact on humanities research practices and finally; other evaluationmethods, like altmetrics, are conventional.

  • 13.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Från sorterandets logik till mätandets praktik: Bibliometrin och forskningsbibliotekens framtid2018Ingår i: Bibliotekarier i teori och praktik: Utbildningsperspektiv på en unik profession / [ed] Joacim Hansson & Per Wisselgren, Lund: BTJ Förlag , 2018, s. 149-167Kapitel i bok, del av antologi (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 14.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Institutionen för ABM, Uppsala Universitet.
    Harvesting footnotes in a rural field: Citation patterns in Swedish literary studies2012Ingår i: Journal of Documentation, ISSN 0022-0418, E-ISSN 1758-7379, Vol. 68, nr 4, s. 536-558Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    Purpose – The aim of this article is to study a locally-oriented and book-based research field usingtwo Swedish language sources. Knowledge about citation patterns outside journal-based, Englishlanguage databases is scarce; thus a substantial part of research in the humanities and the socialsciences is neglected in bibliometric studies.Design/methodology/approach – Citation characteristics (publication type, language, gender andage) in the journal Tidskrift fo¨ r Litteraturvetenskap (2000-2009) and in grant applications (2006-2009)are studied. The datasets are analyzed further, adopting an author-co-citation approach for depictingand comparing the “intellectual base” of the field.Findings – It is shown that monographs and anthologies are the main publication channel inSwedish literary research. English, followed by Swedish, is the major language, and the gender ofauthors seems to influence citation practices. Furthermore, a common intellectual base of literarystudies that is independent of publication type and language could be identified.Practical implications – Bibliometric analysis of fields within the humanities needs to go beyondestablished databases and materials. The extensive use of recent English language monographs inSwedish literary studies informs the acquisition policy of university libraries serving literaturescholars.Originality/value – Citation analysis of non-English sources offers further knowledge aboutscholarly fields with a local and “rural” profile. The approach of using references in grant applicationsprovides a novel and promising venue for bibliometric research.

  • 15.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Institutionen för ABM, Uppsala Universitet.
    Interdisciplinarity and the intellectual base of literature studies: citation analysis of highly cited monographs2011Ingår i: Scientometrics, ISSN 0138-9130, E-ISSN 1588-2861, Vol. 86, nr 3, s. 705-725Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    This article studies interdisciplinarity and the intellectual base of 34 literaturejournals using citation data from Web of Science. Data from two time periods, 1978–1987and 1998–2007 were compared to reveal changes in the interdisciplinary citing ofmonographs. The study extends the analysis to non-source publications; using the classificationof monographs to show changes in the intellectual base. There is support forincreased interdisciplinary citing of sources, especially to the social sciences, and changesin the intellectual base reflect this. The results are explained using theories on the intellectualand social organization of scientific fields and the use of bibliometric methods onthe humanities is discussed. The article demonstrates how citation analysis can provideinsights into the communication patterns and intellectual structure of scholarly fields in thearts and humanities.

  • 16.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Långsamhetens lockelse i den jäktade akademin2016Ingår i: Respons : recensionstidskrift för humaniora & samhällsvetenskap, ISSN 2001-2292, nr 6, s. 2s. 12-13Artikel i tidskrift (Övrig (populärvetenskap, debatt, mm))
  • 17.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    När utbildning blev en tävlingsgren2016Övrigt (Övrig (populärvetenskap, debatt, mm))
  • 18.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Recognition and reward in the academy: Valuing publication oeuvres in biomedicine, economics and history2017Ingår i: Aslib Journal of Information Management, ISSN 2050-3806, E-ISSN 2050-3814, Vol. 69, nr 5, s. 607-623Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    Purpose – The publication oeuvre of a researcher carries great value when academic careers are assessed, and being recognised as a successful candidate is usually equated with being a productive author. Yet, howpublications are valued in the context of evaluating careers is so far an understudied topic. The paper aims to discuss these issues.

    Design/methodology/approach – Through a content analysis of assessment reports in three disciplines – biomedicine, economics and history – this paper analyses how externalities are used to evaluate publication oeuvres. Externalities are defined as features such as reviews and bibliometric indicators, which can be assessed without evaluating the epistemological claims made in the actual text.

    Findings – All three fields emphasise similar aspects when assessing: authorship, publication prestige, temporality of research, reputation within the field and boundary keeping. Yet, how these facets of quality are evaluated, and the means through which they are assessed differs between disciplines. Moreover, research fields orient themselves according to different temporal horizons, i.e. history looks to the past and economics to the future when research is evaluated.

    Research limitations/implications – The complexities involved in the process of evaluating candidates are also reflected in the findings, and while the comparative approach taken effectively highlights domain specific differences it may also hide counter-narratives, and subtle intradisciplinary discussion on quality.

    Originality/value – This study offers a novel perspective on how publications are valued when assessing academic careers. Especially striking is how research across different fields is evaluated through different time horizons. This finding is significant in the debate on more overarching and formal systems of evaluation.

  • 19.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Review of Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact.2015Ingår i: Journal of Documentation, ISSN 0022-0418, E-ISSN 1758-7379, Vol. 71, nr 2, s. 416-418Artikel, recension (Refereegranskat)
  • 20.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Taking Comfort in Points: The Appeal of the Norwegian Model in Sweden2018Ingår i: Journal of Data and Information Science, ISSN ISSN 2096-157X, Vol. 3, nr 4, s. 84-94Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    Purpose: The “Norwegian model” has become widely used for assessment and resource

    allocation purposes. This paper investigates why this model has becomes so widespread and

    influential.

    Approach: A theoretical background is outlined in which the reduction of “uncertainty” is

    highlighted as a key feature of performance measurement systems. These theories are then

    drawn upon when revisiting previous studies of the Norwegian model, its use, and reactions

    to it, in Sweden.

    Findings: The empirical examples, which concern more formal use on the level of universities

    as well as responses from individual researchers, shows how particular parts—especially the

    “publication indicator”—are employed in Swedish academia. The discussion posits that the

    attractiveness of the Norwegian model largely can be explained by its ability to reduce

    complexity and uncertainty, even in fields where traditional bibliometric measurement is less

    applicable.

    Research limitations: The findings presented should be regarded as examples that can be

    used for discussion, but one should be careful to interpret these as representative for broader

    sentiments and trends.

    Implications: The sheer popularity of the Norwegian model, leading to its application in

    contexts for which it was not designed, can be seen as a major challenge for the future.

    Originality: This paper offers a novel perspective on the Norwegian model by focusing on

    its general “appeal”, rather than on its design, use or (mis)-use.

  • 21.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT. Institutionen för ABM, Uppsala Universitet.
    Using altmetrics for assessing research impact in the humanities2014Ingår i: Scientometrics, ISSN 0138-9130, E-ISSN 1588-2861, Vol. 101, nr 2, s. 1419-1430Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    The prospects of altmetrics are especially encouraging for research fields in thehumanities that currently are difficult to study using established bibliometric methods. Yet,little is known about the altmetric impact of research fields in the humanities. Consequently,this paper analyses the altmetric coverage and impact of humanities-orientedarticles and books published by Swedish universities during 2012. Some of the mostcommon altmetric sources are examined using a sample of 310 journal articles and 54books. Mendeley has the highest coverage of journal articles (61 %) followed by Twitter(21 %) while very few of the publications are mentioned in blogs or on Facebook. Books,on the other hand, are quite often tweeted while both Mendeley’s and the novel data sourceLibrary Thing’s coverage is low. Many of the problems of applying bibliometrics to thehumanities are also relevant for altmetric approaches; the importance of non-journalpublications, the reliance on print as well the limited coverage of non-English languagepublications. However, the continuing development and diversification of methods suggeststhat altmetrics could evolve into a valuable tool for assessing research in thehumanities.

  • 22.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Högskolan i Borås, Institutionen Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap / Bibliotekshögskolan.
    Using altmetrics for assessing research impact in the humanities2014Ingår i: Scientometrics, ISSN 0138-9130, E-ISSN 1588-2861, Vol. 101, nr 2, s. 1419-1430Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    The prospects of altmetrics are especially encouraging for research fields in the humanities that currently are difficult to study using established bibliometric methods. Yet, little is known about the altmetric impact of research fields in the humanities. Consequently, this paper analyses the altmetric coverage and impact of humanities-oriented articles and books published by Swedish universities during 2012. Some of the most common altmetric sources are examined using a sample of 310 journal articles and 54 books. Mendeley has the highest coverage of journal articles (61 %) followed by Twitter (21 %) while very few of the publications are mentioned in blogs or on Facebook. Books, on the other hand, are quite often tweeted while both Mendeley’s and the novel data source Library Thing’s coverage is low. Many of the problems of applying bibliometrics to the humanities are also relevant for altmetric approaches; the importance of non-journal publications, the reliance on print as well the limited coverage of non-English language publications. However, the continuing development and diversification of methods suggests that altmetrics could evolve into a valuable tool for assessing research in the humanities.

  • 23.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    What is a discipline?: The conceptualization of research areas and their operationalization in bibliometric research2018Ingår i: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators / [ed] Rodrigo Costas Thomas Franssen Alfredo Yegros-Yegros, Leiden, 2018Konferensbidrag (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    This paper highlights disadvantages of conceptual impreciseness, and advocates further attention to the labels and concepts used when classifying clusters or groups based on bibliographic data. The main focus of the analysis is on the concept of ‘discipline’ and how it is used in bibliometric research, but the implications concern a broader array of related terms. 

  • 24.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Ökad frihet från staten har lett till starkare styrning2017Ingår i: Respons, nr 6, s. 56-57Artikel, recension (Övrig (populärvetenskap, debatt, mm))
  • 25.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    et al.
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT. Institutionen för ABM, Uppsala Universitet.
    de Rijcke, Sarah
    CWTS, Leiden University.
    Accountability in context: Effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University2015Ingår i: Research Evaluation, ISSN 0958-2029, E-ISSN 1471-5449, Vol. 24, nr 1, s. 63-77Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    Given the increased role of bibliometric measures in research evaluation, it is striking that studiesof actual changes in research practice are rare. Most studies and comments on ‘a metric culture’in academia focus on the ideological and political level, and there is a clear shortage of empiricalstudies that analyze how researchers handle demands for accountability in context. In adopting amixed-methods approach involving both bibliometric data and answers form questionnaires, weprovide an in-depth study of how researchers at the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University (Sweden)respond to the implementation of performance-based research evaluation systems. Publicationpatterns from 2006 to 2013 show that journal publications, especially English-language ones, areincreasing, and the proportion of peer-reviewed publications has doubled. These changes are inline with the incentives of the evaluation systems under study. Answers to the survey confirm thatscholars are conscious about this development, and several respondents articulate a disagreementbetween disciplinary norms and external demands. However, disciplinary background aswell as career stage or academic age appears to have a significant influence on how individualresearchers react to the instigation of evaluation systems. Finally, responses to national andlocal evaluation regimes are complex, localized, and dependent on many factors. In-depthcontextualized studies of research practices are needed in order to understand how

  • 26.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    et al.
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    de Rijcke, Sarah
    Leiden University.
    From eminence to excellence: University rankings as calculative devices2015Konferensbidrag (Refereegranskat)
  • 27.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    et al.
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    de Rijcke, Sarah
    CWTS, Leiden University.
    Rushforth, Alex
    CWTS, Leiden University.
    Quantified academic selves: the gamification of research through social networking services2016Ingår i: Information research, ISSN 1368-1613, E-ISSN 1368-1613, Vol. 21, nr 2Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    Introduction. Our study critically engages with techniques of self-quantification in contemporary academia, by demonstrating how social networking services enact research and scholarly communication as a 'game'.

    Method. The empirical part of the study involves an analysis of two leading platforms: Impactstory and ResearchGate. Observed qualities of these platforms will be analyzed in detail with concrete examples of gaming features in focus. Subsequently, we relate the development of these digital platforms to a broader 'quantified self movement'. Special attention will also be paid to how these platforms contribute to a general quantification of the academic (authorial) self. 

    Theory. Theoretically we relate the 'gamification' of research to neoliberal ideas about markets and competition. Our analysis then extends to long-standing and fundamental ideas about self-betterment expressed in the philosophy of Peter Sloterdijk. 

    Findings. Our study shows how social networking services, such as ResearchGate and Impactstory, enact researchers as 'entrepreneurs of themselves' in a marketplace of ideas, and the quantification of scholarly reputation to a single number plays an important role in this process. Moreover, the technologies that afford these types of quantifiable interactions affect the 'unfolding ontology' of algorithmic academic identities. 

    Conclusions. The gamification of quantified academic selves intensifies the competitive nature of scholarship, it commodifies academic outputs and it might lead to goal displacement and cheating. However, self-quantification might also serve as a liberating and empowering activity for the individual researcher as alternative measures of impact and productivity are provided by these platforms.

  • 28.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    et al.
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    de Rijcke, Sarah
    CWTS, Leiden University.
    Rushforth, Alex
    CWTS, Leiden University.
    Wallenburg, Iris
    Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    Bal, Roland
    Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    Gaming Ratings in Research and Care2016Konferensbidrag (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 29.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    et al.
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    de Rijcke, Sarah
    Leiden University.
    Wouters, Paul
    Leiden University.
    From Eminent Men to Excellent Universities: University Rankings as Calculative Devices2017Ingår i: Minerva, ISSN 0026-4695, E-ISSN 1573-1871, Vol. 55, nr 4, s. 391-411Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    Global university rankings have become increasingly important ‘calculative devices’ for assessing the ‘quality’ of higher education and research. Their ability to make characteristics of universities ‘calculable’ is here exemplified by the first proper university ranking ever, produced as early as 1910 by the American psychologist James McKeen Cattell. Our paper links the epistemological rationales behind the construction of this ranking to the sociopolitical context in which Cattell operated: an era in which psychology became institutionalized against the backdrop of the eugenics movement, and in which statistics of science became used to counter a perceived decline in ‘great men.’ Over time, however, the ‘eminent man,’ shaped foremost by heredity and upbringing, came to be replaced by the excellent university as the emblematic symbol of scientific and intellectual strength. We also show that Cattell’s ranking was generative of new forms of the social, traces of which can still be found today in the enactment of ‘excellence’ in global university rankings.

  • 30.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    et al.
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Fredrik, Åström
    Lunds universitet.
    The multi-layered and multilevel use of bibliometric measures in Swedish universities: Isomorphism, translation and strategic choice2015Konferensbidrag (Refereegranskat)
  • 31.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    et al.
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Haddow, Gaby
    Curtin University.
    Conflicting Measures and Values: How Humanities Scholars in Australia and Sweden Use and React to Bibliometric Indicators2018Ingår i: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, ISSN 2330-1635, E-ISSN 2330-1643, Vol. 69, nr 7, s. 924-935Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    While bibliometric indicators, such as the journal impact factor, have long played an important role in many STEM disciplines it has been repeatedly shown that established bibliometric methods have limited use in the humanities. Using a questionnaire on metrics use and publication practices in Australia and Sweden, we tested the assumption that indicators play a minor role among humanities scholars. Our findings show that our respondents use indicators to a considerable degree, with a range of indicators and rankings being employed. The scholars use metrics as part of institutional policy, in CVs and applications, as well as for general promotion of their work. Notable in our results is that a much larger share of researchers (62%) in Australia used metrics compared to Sweden (14%). Scholar’s attitudes regarding bibliometrics are mixed; many are critical of these measures, while at the same time feeling pressured to use them. One main tension described by our respondents is between intradisciplinary criteria of quality and formalized indicators, and negotiating these “orders of worth” is a challenging balancing act, especially for younger researchers.

  • 32.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    et al.
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Nelhans, Gustaf
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Eklund, Pieta
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Åström, Fredrik
    Lund University Library.
    The heterogeneous landscape of bibliometric indicators: Evaluating models for allocating resources at Swedish universities2016Ingår i: Research Evaluation, ISSN 0958-2029, E-ISSN 1471-5449, s. 1-16Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    The use of bibliometric indicators on individual and national levels has gathered considerable interest in recent years, but the application of bibliometric models for allocating resources at the institutional level has so far gathered less attention. This article studies the implementation of bibliometric measures for allocating resources at Swedish universities. Several models and indicators based on publications, citations, and research grants are identified. The design of performance-based resource allocation across major universities is then analysed using a framework from the field of evaluation studies. The practical implementation, the incentives as well as the ‘ethics’ of models and indicators, are scrutinized in order to provide a theoretically informed assessment of evaluation systems. It is evident that the requirements, goals, possible consequences, and the costs of evaluation are scarcely discussed before these systems are implemented. We find that allocation models are implemented in response to a general trend of assessment across all types of activities and organizations, but the actual design of evaluation systems is dependent on size, orientation, and the overall organization of the institution in question.

  • 33.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    et al.
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Rushforth, Alex
    CWTS, Leiden University.
    Indicators as judgment devices: The use of bibliometrics for evaluating candidates for professorships in biomedicine and economics2016Ingår i: Proceedings of 21st Nordic Workshop on Bibliometrics and Research Policy (NWB’2016) / [ed] Lorna Wildgaard, Toine Bogers and Birger Larsen, Aalborg University , 2016, s. 7-7Konferensbidrag (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    The number of publications has been a fundamental merit in the competition for academic positions since the late 18th century. Today, the simple counting of publications has been supplemented with a whole range of bibliometric measures, which supposedly not only measure the volume of research but also its impact. In this study, we investigate how bibliometrics are used for evaluating the impact and quality of publications in two specific settings: biomedicine and economics. Our study exposes the extent and type of metrics used in external evaluations of candidates for academic positions at Swedish universities. Moreover, we show how different bibliometric indicators, both explicitly and implicitly, are employed to value and rank candidates. Our findings contribute to a further understanding of bibliometric indicators as “judgment devices” employed to evaluate individuals and their published works within specific fields. We also show how “expertise” in using bibliometrics for evaluative purposes is negotiated at the interface between domain knowledge and skills in using indicators. In fact, examiners in these documents emerge as experts in three roles: 1) as domain experts 2) experts on metrics and 3) experts on how metrics are used and valued within their field. In short expertise here means evaluating not only publications but also judgment devices. In line with these results we propose that the use of metrics in this context is best described as a form of “citizen biblometrics” – an underspecified term which we build upon in this paper.

  • 34.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    et al.
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Rushforth, Alexander
    Leiden University.
    Indicators as judgment devices: An empirical study of citizen bibliometrics in research evaluation2017Ingår i: Research Evaluation, ISSN 0958-2029, E-ISSN 1471-5449, Vol. 3, nr 1, s. 169-180Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    A researcher’s number of publications has been a fundamental merit in the competition for academic positions since the late 18th century. Today, the simple counting of publications has been supplemented with a whole range of bibliometric indicators, which supposedly not only measures the volume of research but also its impact. In this study, we investigate how bibliometrics are used for evaluating the impact and quality of publications in two specific settings: biomedicine and economics. Our study exposes the various metrics used in external evaluations of candidates for academic positions at Swedish universities. Moreover, we show how different bibliometric indicators, both explicitly and implicitly, are employed to assess and rank candidates. Our findings contribute to a further understanding of bibliometric indicators as ‘judgment devices’ that are employed in evaluating individuals and their published works within specific fields. We also show how ‘expertise’ in using bibliometrics for evaluative purposes is negotiated at the interface between domain knowledge and skills in using indicators. In line with these results, we propose that the use of metrics we report is best described as a form of ‘citizen bibliometrics’—an underspecified term which we build upon in the article.

  • 35.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    et al.
    Institutionen för ABM, Uppsala Universitet.
    Åström, Fredrik
    Mapping the humanities: informetric analyses of literary studies through A&HCI2011Ingår i: The 13th conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Vol 2., 2011, s. 993-995Konferensbidrag (Refereegranskat)
  • 36.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    et al.
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Åström, Fredrik
    Lund University.
    Hansson, Joacim
    Linneaus University.
    Scientific publications as boundary objects: theorising the intersection of classification and research evaluation2017Ingår i: Information research, ISSN 1368-1613, E-ISSN 1368-1613, Vol. 22, nr 1, artikel-id colis1623Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    Introduction. When using bibliometrics for research evaluation, the classification of research fields is an issue of great importance. The purpose of this paper is to outline a brief theoretical framework for analysing the role of classification in research evaluation practices. 

    Theory. Taking departure in the concept of ‘boundary objects’ we develop a theoretical framework for analyses of how scientific publications negotiate between different social worlds. Moreover, by adding the perspective of large evaluative infrastructures our study seeks to highlight tensions between local practices and global standards. 

    Empirical example. One scientific article was analysed in terms of the different ways it can be classified on author and affiliation levels, on a documental level, and on a bureaucratic level. 

    Discussion. Publications are boundary objects residing between social worlds: the context of communication and the context of evaluation. Tensions between social worlds become apparent in infrastructures, which aims to serve the demands both of communication and of evaluation.

  • 37.
    Karlsson, Alexander
    et al.
    Informatics Research Center, University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Högskolan i Borås, Institutionen Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap / Bibliotekshögskolan. Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Steinhauer, Joe. H
    Informatics Research Center, University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden.
    Falkman, Göran
    Informatics Research Center, University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden.
    Olson, Nasrine
    Högskolan i Borås, Institutionen Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap / Bibliotekshögskolan. Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Nelhans, Gustaf
    Högskolan i Borås, Institutionen Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap / Bibliotekshögskolan. Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Nolin, Jan
    Högskolan i Borås, Institutionen Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap / Bibliotekshögskolan. Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Modeling uncertainty in bibliometrics and information retrieval: an information fusion approach2015Ingår i: Scientometrics, ISSN 0138-9130, E-ISSN 1588-2861, Vol. 102, nr 3, s. 2255-2274Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    We describe ongoing research where the aim is to apply recent results from the research field of information fusion to bibliometric analysis and information retrieval. We highlight the importance of ‘uncertainty’ within information fusion and argue that this concept is crucial also for bibliometrics and information retrieval. More specifically, we elaborate on three research strategies related to uncertainty: uncertainty management methods, explanation of uncertainty and visualization of uncertainty. We exemplify our strategies to the classical problem of author name disambiguation where we show how uncertainty can be modeled explained and visualized using information fusion. We show how an information seeker can benefit from tracing increases/decreases of uncertainty in the reasoning process. We also present how such changes can be explained for the information seeker through visualization techniques, which are employed to highlight the complexity involved in the process of modeling and managing uncertainty in bibliometric analysis. Finally we argue that a further integration of information fusion approaches in the research area of bibliometrics and information retrieval may results in new and fruitful venues of research.

  • 38.
    Karlsson, Charlie
    et al.
    Jönköping University.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Review of: Global Entrepreneurship, Institutions and Incentives, by Zoltán J. Ács. 2016. Northampton, Massachusetts: Edward Elgar2016Ingår i: Journal of regional science, ISSN 0022-4146, E-ISSN 1467-9787, Vol. 56, nr 4, s. 725-727Artikel, recension (Refereegranskat)
  • 39.
    Leydesdorff, Loet
    et al.
    University of Amsterdam.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Institutionen för ABM, Uppsala Universitet.
    Salah, Almila
    Netherlands Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences.
    The structure of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index: A mapping on the basis of aggregated citations among 1,157 journals2011Ingår i: Journal of The American Society For Information Science And Technology, Vol. 62, nr 12, s. 2414-2426Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    Using the Arts & Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI) 2008,we apply mapping techniques previously developed formapping journal structures in the Science and SocialSciences Citation Indices. Citation relations among the110,718 records were aggregated at the level of 1,157journals specific to the A&HCI, and the journal structuresare questioned on whether a cognitive structure can bereconstructed and visualized. Both cosine-normalization(bottom up) and factor analysis (top down) suggest a divisioninto approximately 12 subsets. The relations amongthese subsets are explored using various visualizationtechniques. However, we were not able to retrieve thisstructure using the Institute for Scientific InformationSubject Categories, including the 25 categories that arespecific to the A&HCI.We discuss options for validationsuch as against the categories of the Humanities Indicatorsof the American Academy of Arts and Sciences,the panel structure of the European Reference Indexfor the Humanities, and compare our results with the curriculumorganization of the Humanities Section of theCollege of Letters and Sciences of the University of Californiaat Los Angeles as an example of institutionalorganization.

  • 40.
    Pilerot, Ola
    et al.
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Moring, Camilla
    University of Copenhagen, Royal School of Library and Information Science.
    The many faces of practice theory in library and information studies2017Ingår i: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science, Uppsala, Sweden, June 27-29, 2016, 2017, Vol. 22, artikel-id colis1602Konferensbidrag (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    Introduction. This paper presents an exploration of how the notion of ”practice” is theorized and applied in library and information studies. Method. To highlight how “practice” is conceptualized and to discern what methodological approaches are taken, a qualitative analysis was conducted of a selection of practice-oriented contributions to the library and information studies literature. A bibliometric study of publications relating to “practice theory” provided a complementary quantitative overview of the influence of “the practice turn” in library and information studies. Analysis. Through reading a number of introductions to practice theories, a selection of prominent characteristics were identified. These characteristics provided guidance for the close-reading of the sample of practice-oriented library and information studies literature. As well as indicating direction for the qualitative analysis, the outcomes of the bibliometric study were recontexualized by the qualitative study. Results. The practice-oriented library and information studies literature can be divided into four different areas based on disciplinary influences. Authors are highlighting different key tenets when adhering to practice theory. It is possible to identify at least four different methodological approaches to empirical studies in the discipline.Conclusions. There is not one “practice-based approach” in library and information studies, but rather a multifaceted strand, which exhibits many different characteristics.

  • 41.
    Pölönen, Janne
    et al.
    Federation of Finnish Learned Societies.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Historical bibliometrics using Google Scholar: The case of Roman law, 1500-20162019Ingår i: Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics / [ed] Catalano, Giuseppe; Daraio, Cinzia; Gregori, Martina; Moed, Henk F.; Ruocco, Giancarlo;, 2019, s. 2491-2492Konferensbidrag (Refereegranskat)
  • 42.
    Rushforth, Alexander
    et al.
    Centre for Science and Technoogy Studies, Leidens Universitet.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    The Author Multiple: Reflections on a One Week Lorentz-Workshop on Authorship in Transition2015Ingår i: EASST review, ISSN 1384-5160, Vol. 34, nr 2, s. 8-12Artikel i tidskrift (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 43.
    Schirone, Marco
    et al.
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Hammarfelt, BjörnHögskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.Nelhans, GustafHögskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    23rd Nordic Workshop on Bibliometrics and Research Policy 2018 Book of abstracts2018Proceedings (redaktörskap) (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
    Abstract [en]

    Initiated by Professors Olle Persson and Peter Ingwersen, bibliometric researchers in the Nordic countries have arranged annual Nordic workshops on bibliometrics since 1996. The general scope of the Nordic Workshop on Bibliometrics and Research Policy is to present recent bibliometric research in the Nordic countries, to create better linkages between the bibliometric research groups and their PhD students, and to link bibliometric research with research policy.The workshop language is English and the workshop is open to participants from any nation. The 23rd Nordic Workshop on Bibliometrics and Research Policy (NWB’2018) was organized by the Swedish School of Library and Information Science (SSLIS) at University of Borås, Sweden. It was held at University of Borås, on November 7-9th, 2018 with 100 participants.In total, we received 35 submissions. After reviewing the submissions, the program committee decided which papers were to be presented orally and which as poster presentations. 21 papers were accepted as oral presentations. These, as well as the titles of the two invited keynote talks and the abstracts of 9 posters, are presented as abstracts in these proceedings. The posters and oral presentation slides are also available for viewing and peer-feedback at figshare (with citable DOIs):https://doi.orgWe would like to thank all authors for their submissions, the session chairs and the keynote speakers, Fredrik Åström and Merle Jacob, for their contributions to the workshop and the student volunteers, for their diligent efforts during the workshop. Further, we would like to thank the sponsors for their generous financial support, without which the Nordic workshops could not be organised in their current form.The NWB’2017 website is at https://hb.se/nwb2018Follow on twitter as @nwb_2018 and #nwb2018

  • 44.
    Wallenburg, Iris
    et al.
    Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
    Kaltenbrunner, Wolfgang
    Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden, The Netherlands.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    de Rijcke, Sarah
    Leiden University.
    Bal, Roland
    Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
    Advancing to the Next Level: Caring for Evaluative Metrics Monsters in Academia and Healthcare2018Ingår i: Living with Monsters?  IS&O 2018.: Social Implications of Algorithmic Phenomena, Hybrid Agency, and the Performativity of Technology. / [ed] Schultze U., Aanestad M., Mähring M., Østerlund C., Riemer K., Springer, 2018, Vol. 543Konferensbidrag (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    In this paper we use the notions of play and (finite and infinite) games to analyze performance management practices in professional work. Whilst evaluative metrics are often described as ‘monsters’ impacting on professional work, we illustrate how metrics can also become part of practices of caring for such work. Analyzing the use of evaluative metrics in law faculties and in hospitals, we show how finite games – games played to win – and infinite games – games played for the purpose of continuing to play – are intertwined and how this intertwinement affects academic and healthcare work.

  • 45.
    Åström, Fredrik
    et al.
    Lund University.
    Hammarfelt, Björn
    Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.
    Conceptualising dimensions of bibliometric assessment: From resource allocation systems to evaluative landscapes2019Ingår i: Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics / [ed] Catalano, Giuseppe; Daraio, Cinzia; Gregori, Martina; Moed, Henk F.; Ruocco, Giancarlo;, 2019, s. 1256-1261Konferensbidrag (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    The purpose of this paper is to discuss the conceptualisation of bibliometric analyses in terms of the levels on which they are performed, adding contextual factors to the dimension where the size of the unit being analysed is considered. Based on empirical investigations of resource allocation systems and research evaluation practices, as well as the previous literature conceptualising bibliometric analyses, a framework based on Whitley’s (2000) notion of research fields as ‘reputational work organisations’, is discussed. The results suggest adding a contextual ‘reputational dimension’ to the size-based dimension distinguishing between micro-, meso- andmacro-level analyses. Furthermore, we propose that ‘evaluative landscapes’ (Brandter, 2017) might be a fruitful approach for further analysing how complex and multifaceted landscapes of research assessment affects the individual researcher.

1 - 45 av 45
RefereraExporteraLänk till träfflistan
Permanent länk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf