Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Possible effects of a course in cardiovascular nursing on prehospital care of patients experiencing suspected acute coronary syndrome: a cluster randomised controlled trial
University of Borås, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare. (PreHospen)
University of Borås, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare. (PreHospen)
University of Borås, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare. (PreHospen)
University of Borås, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare. (PreHospen)
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: BMC Nursing, E-ISSN 1472-6955, Vol. 15, no 52Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background

Current research suggests that nurses can influence the outcome for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of this study has been to evaluate whether a course in cardiovascular nursing (CVN) can improve ambulance nurses’ (ANs’) prehospital care of patients experiencing suspected ACS, related to pain intensity.

Methods

This is a cluster randomised controlled trial that was conducted in the ambulance services. Patients were allocated to one of two groups: in the first group, patients were treated by ANs who had attended the CVN course and in the second group patients were treated by ANs without this qualification. Inclusion criteria were: 1/pain raising suspicion of ACS, and 2/pain score ≥4 on a visual analogue scale (VAS). The primary outcome was the estimated intensity of pain or discomfort according to VAS 15 min after randomisation. Secondary outcomes were estimated intensity of pain or discomfort on admission to hospital and further requirement of pain treatment, as well as symptoms such as paleness and/or cold sweat; nausea and/or vomiting; anxiety, dyspnea, degree of alertness, respiratory depression and aggressiveness. A further secondary outcome measured was survival to 30 days. Lastly, a final diagnosis was made. A total of 38 ANs attended the CVN course. There were 1,747 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria.

Results

The pain score did not differ significantly between the two groups fifteen minutes after randomisation (median value of VAS was 4.0 in both groups). On admission to hospital the pain score was significantly lower for patients treated by an AN who had attended the CVN course (n = 332) compared with those treated by an AN who had not attended the course (n = 1,415) (median 2.5 and 3.0 respectively, p = 0.001). The ANs who had attended the course used higher doses of morphine.

Conclusions

An educational intervention with a CVN course did not relate significantly to more efficient pain relief in suspected ACS during the first 15 min. However, this intervention was associated with more effective pain relief later on in the prehospital setting. Thus, a CVN course for ANs appears to be associated with reduced pain intensity among patients experiencing suspected ACS. This result needs however to be confirmed in further trials.

Trial registration

The ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration System (registration number NCT00792181).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 15, no 52
National Category
Health Sciences
Research subject
Människan i vården
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-10663DOI: 10.1186/s12912-016-0175-1ISI: 000382358900001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84985011791OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-10663DiVA, id: diva2:963134
Available from: 2016-09-08 Created: 2016-09-08 Last updated: 2024-07-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(458 kB)294 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 458 kBChecksum SHA-512
335749ebebffc373a1d85c8fc69d451f6d69064cffc98444a40def57026fff4f2aae8b019668219ae706dd2dfc46e62df83147489b6a8c7acff1a86037c4c9d7
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopushttp://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/15/52

Authority records

Wireklint Sundström, BirgittaHerlitz, JohanAndersson, Henrik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wireklint Sundström, BirgittaHerlitz, JohanAndersson, Henrik
By organisation
Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare
In the same journal
BMC Nursing
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 294 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 209 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf