Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A Novel Process Simulation Model (PSM) for Anaerobic Digestion Using Aspen Plus
University of Borås, School of Engineering.
University of Borås, School of Engineering.
University of Borås, School of Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4887-2433
2014 (English)Other (Other academic)
Sustainable development
The content falls within the scope of Sustainable Development
Resource type
Software, multimedia
Abstract [en]

A novel process simulation model (PSM) was developed for biogas production in anaerobic digesters using AspenPlus®. The PSM is a library model of anaerobic digestion, which predicts the biogas production from any substrate at any given process condition. A total of 46 reactions were used in the model, which include inhibitions, rate-kinetics, pH, ammonia, volume, loading rate, and retention time. The hydrolysis reactions were based on the extent of the reaction, while the acidogenic, acetogenic, and methanogenic reactions were based on the kinetics. The PSM was validated against a variety of lab and industrial data on anaerobic digestion. The P-value after statistical analysis was found to be 0.701, which showed that there was no significant difference between discrete validations and processing conditions. The sensitivity analysis for a ±10% change in composition of substrate and extent of reaction results in 5.285% higher value than the experimental value. The model is available at http://hdl.handle.net/2320/12358 (Rajendran et al., 2013b).

Place, publisher, year, pages
Elsevier BV , 2014.
Keyword [en]
Resursåtervinning
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Research subject
Resource Recovery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-5381DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.051PubMedID: 24524857Local ID: 2320/12358OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-5381DiVA: diva2:884809
Available from: 2015-12-17 Created: 2015-12-17 Last updated: 2016-05-13
In thesis
1. Industrial Bioprocess Developments for Biogas and Ethanol Production
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Industrial Bioprocess Developments for Biogas and Ethanol Production
2015 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Current biofuels face a noteworthy misfortune on commercialization because of its economiccomparison with low-cost fuel from the oil reserves. To compete with gasoline as a fuel, thebiofuels need to be economically feasible and demonstrated on a large-scale. Biogas and ethanolhave a great potential as commercial biofuels, even though it has difficulties, for example, highcapitalinvestment, absence of demonstrated innovations, and availability of raw materials and soforth. This thesis focuses on different application-driven bioprocess developments for improvingthe techno-economic feasibility of the biogas and ethanol industries.

The biogas industry was studied from three different perspectives:

1) Modeling approach in which a Process Simulation Model (PSM) model was developed forpredicting the biogas productions, as exploiting new substrates is vital for a biogas industrygrowth. The PSM model was created using Aspen Plus® which includes 46 reactions of differentphases in the Anaerobic Digestion (AD) processes. It also contains certain important processparameters, thermodynamics, rate-kinetics, and inhibitions involved in the AD processes. PSMwas a library model for the AD processes, which was validated against the laboratory andindustrial data. The validation showed that the PSM predicted the biogas production about 5% inexcess, which could ease the biogas industry to predict biogas from new substrates.

2) Simulation approach to study the imperative components affecting the profitability of theplant. For this purpose, a local municipality plant was studied under distinct situations. The choiceof upgrading method, capacity, cost of waste and its processing, number of digesters used, etc.were exploited. The results showed that the collection and transportation fee, landfilling fee, andthe reduced operation of a plant were the main considerations in influencing its profitability.Moreover, it was identified that for bigger cities the decentralization strategy could beat theexpense of collection and transportation of waste, and the plant could obtain a 17.8% return oninvestment.

3) Rethinking digester technology in which the cost of the digester was significantly lessenedusing a cutting-edge textile, which was principally intended for developing countries. The digestercost played an important role in consuming biogas for different applications. The textile digesterwas tested on a laboratory scale, followed by field tests in different countries including India,Indonesia, and Brazil. Textile digesters cost one-tenth of the conventional digesters, and thepayback was more or less between 1–3 years, when replacing the Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG)and kerosene as a cooking fuel for households.

When it comes to ethanol, the first generation ethanol production using grains was financiallypossible with a payback of about 13 years. Nonetheless, with the fluctuation of the oil prices, theethanol industries need to look for alternative sources of revenues. Different retrofits wereconsidered, including the effect of thin-stillage/whole-stillage to ethanol and biomass, in additionto the integration of the first and second generation ethanol production. The results revealed that4% additional ethanol could be obtained when the thin-stillage was converted into ethanol andfungal biomass, while the payback was reduced to 11.5 years. The integration of the first andsecond generation ethanol production revealed that it has a positive influence on the overalleconomics of the process with a payback of 10.5 years. This could help the ethanol industries toconsider a revamp for a better environmental, economic, and energy efficient process.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Borås: Högskolan i Borås, 2015. 64 p.
Series
Skrifter från Högskolan i Borås, ISSN 0280-381X ; 71
Keyword
biogas, ethanol, process design, techno-economic analysis, simulation, modeling
National Category
Environmental Biotechnology
Research subject
Resource Recovery
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-668 (URN)978-91-87525-71-1 (ISBN)978-91-87525-72-8 (ISBN)
Public defence
2015-11-06, E310, Allegatan 1, Borås, 10:00 (English)
Available from: 2015-10-02 Created: 2015-08-25 Last updated: 2017-05-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(625 kB)920 downloads
File information
File name ATTACHMENT01.pdfFile size 625 kBChecksum SHA-512
39070dd160a0755e8e2f0af01a4d3115a797317926f0a7d488c5e007121968b29a59a532a49e8d4950bf4bd3bb59e830a271baceff6b31799d719b08ee875349
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf
process simulation model(56 kB)317 downloads
File information
File name ATTACHMENT03.zipFile size 56 kBChecksum SHA-512
34098287dd5419f7f4bcf535a88c2cd43112a0e5b5b834fa86e87144afd81ffc3a67911afe8d295cf9be0099b3aa4bf58b1c121b21813fb5555bfeba89db3c16
Type attachmentMimetype application/zip

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Rajendran, KarthikLundin, MagnusTaherzadeh, Mohammad J

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rajendran, KarthikLundin, MagnusTaherzadeh, Mohammad J
By organisation
School of Engineering
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 0 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 5250 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf