Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The large sample size fallacy
University of Borås, School of Engineering.
2013 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, ISSN 0283-9318, E-ISSN 1471-6712, Vol. 27, no 2, p. 487-492Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background:  Significance in the statistical sense has little to do with significance in the common practical sense. Statistical significance is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for practical significance. Hence, results that are extremely statistically significant may be highly nonsignificant in practice. The degree of practical significance is generally determined by the size of the observed effect, not the p-value. The results of studies based on large samples are often characterized by extreme statistical significance despite small or even trivial effect sizes. Interpreting such results as significant in practice without further analysis is referred to as the large sample size fallacy in this article. Aim:  The aim of this article is to explore the relevance of the large sample size fallacy in contemporary nursing research. Results:  Relatively few nursing articles display explicit measures of observed effect sizes or include a qualitative discussion of observed effect sizes. Statistical significance is often treated as an end in itself. Conclusion:  Effect sizes should generally be calculated and presented along with p-values for statistically significant results, and observed effect sizes should be discussed qualitatively through direct and explicit comparisons with the effects in related literature.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. , 2013. Vol. 27, no 2, p. 487-492
Keywords [sv]
Kvalitetsdriven logistik
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-1334DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01052.xISI: 000318815700034PubMedID: 22862286Local ID: 2320/11510OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-1334DiVA, id: diva2:869358
Available from: 2015-11-13 Created: 2015-11-13 Last updated: 2017-12-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Lantz, Björn

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lantz, Björn
By organisation
School of Engineering
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 68 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf