System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The community function of schools in rural areas: normalising dominant cultural relations through the curriculum silencing local knowledge
University of Borås, Faculty of Librarianship, Information, Education and IT. (PAUS)
Department of Education and Special Education, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2502-3124
2023 (English)In: Pedagogy, Culture & Society, ISSN 1468-1366, E-ISSN 1747-5104, p. 1-18Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Sustainable development
According to the author(s), the content of this publication falls within the area of sustainable development.
Abstract [en]

Schools in rural places in European societies generally teach the same content and perform as well as other national schools do on national tests and international comparison assessments such as PISA. However, by doing this they may also marginalise local rural knowledge and expose rural populations to a (for them) culturally insensitive curriculum. Using a meta-ethnographic analysis this article identifies how rural educational ethnographic researchers working in Sweden have depicted this situation and the social and cultural interests in which it operates. It identifies how research articles often describe rural schools as fulfiling a local community function, but it also questions exactly what kind of function this is and whether we can really talk about rural schools operating in local community interests generally or even at all. Instead, it is rather more the case that schools in rural places contribute to some individual educational interests and possibilities along with a general cultural domination and marginalisation of rural consciousness and interests. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2023. p. 1-18
Keywords [en]
Rurality, structural domination, hegemony, ideology, normalisation, exploitation and abandonment
National Category
Pedagogical Work
Research subject
Teacher Education and Education Work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-31505DOI: 10.1080/14681366.2023.2298466ISI: 001133045500001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85180839278OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-31505DiVA, id: diva2:1833437
Funder
Swedish Research CouncilAvailable from: 2024-01-31 Created: 2024-01-31 Last updated: 2024-02-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Beach, Dennis

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Beach, DennisÖhrn, Elisabet
By organisation
Faculty of Librarianship, Information, Education and IT
In the same journal
Pedagogy, Culture & Society
Pedagogical Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 39 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf