Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Perspectives of Policy Makers and Service Users Concerning the Implementation of eHealth in Sweden: Interview Study
Jönköping University, HHJ, Avdelningen för rehabilitering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2764-3722
Jönköping University, HHJ, Avdelningen för omvårdnad.
Jönköping University, HHJ, Avdelningen för omvårdnad.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1884-5696
Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Journal of Medical Internet Research, E-ISSN 1438-8871, Vol. 24, no 1, article id e28870Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Increasing life spans of populations and a growing demand for more advanced care make effective and cost-efficient provision of health care necessary. eHealth technology is often proposed, although research on barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of eHealth technology is still scarce and fragmented. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to explore the perceptions concerning barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of eHealth among policy makers and service users and explore the ways in which their perceptions converge and differ. METHODS: This study used interview data from policy makers at different levels of health care (n=7) and service users enrolled in eHealth interventions (n=25). The analysis included separate qualitative content analyses for the 2 groups and then a second qualitative content analysis to explore differences and commonalities. RESULTS: Implementation barriers perceived by policy makers were that not all service users benefit from eHealth and that there is uncertainty about the impact of eHealth on the work of health care professionals. Policy makers also perceived political decision-making as complex; this included problems related to provision of technical infrastructure and lack of extra resources for health care digitalization. Facilitators were policy makers' conviction that eHealth is what citizens want, their belief in eHealth solutions as beneficial for health care practice, and their belief in the importance of health care digitalization. Barriers for service users comprised capability limitations and varied preferences of service users and a mismatch of technology with user needs, lack of data protection, and their perception of eHealth as being more time consuming. Facilitators for service users were eHealth technology design and match with their skill set, personal feedback and staff support, a sense of privacy, a credible sender, and flexible use of time.There were several commonalities between the 2 stakeholder groups. Facilitators for both groups were the strong impetus toward technology adoption in society and expectations of time flexibility. Both groups perceived barriers in the difficulties of tailoring eHealth, and both groups expressed uncertainty about the care burden distribution. There were also differences: policy makers perceived that their decision-making was very complex and that resources for implementation were limited. Service users highlighted their need to feel that their digital data were protected and that they needed to trust the eHealth sender. CONCLUSIONS: Perceptions about barriers to and facilitators of eHealth implementation varied among stakeholders in different parts of the health care system. The study points to the need to reach an enhanced mutual understanding of priorities and overcome challenges at both the micro and macro levels of the health care system. More well-balanced decisions at the policy-maker level may lead to more effective and sustainable development and future implementation of eHealth.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
JMIR Publications , 2022. Vol. 24, no 1, article id e28870
Keywords [en]
clients, computer-assisted therapy, consultation telehealth, decision-makers, implementation, mobile phone, patients, politicians, qualitative methods, remote
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-30785DOI: 10.2196/28870ISI: 000766777000007PubMedID: 35089139Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85123815586Local ID: GOA;;794655OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-30785DiVA, id: diva2:1812167
Available from: 2022-02-07 Created: 2023-11-15 Last updated: 2024-01-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopusFulltext

Authority records

Nygårdh, Annette

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Neher, MargitNygårdh, AnnetteBroström, Anders
In the same journal
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 24 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf