Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Registered nurses’ views on consideration of patient perspectives during multidisciplinary team meetings in cancer care
Regional Cancer Centre South, Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden; Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Scheeletorget 1, 22 363, Lund, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2719-1866
Regional Cancer Centre South, Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden; Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Department of Surgery and Gastroenterology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
University of Borås, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0047-9723
Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Scheeletorget 1, 22 363, Lund, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: BMC Nursing, E-ISSN 1472-6955, Vol. 21, no 1, article id 350Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background

Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs) represent an integral component of modern cancer care and have increasingly been implemented to ensure accurate and evidence-based treatment recommendations. During MDTMs, multiple and complex medical and patient-related information should be considered by a multi-professional team whose members contribute various perspectives. Registered nurses (RNs) are expected to share information on the patient perspective at MDTMs. However, research suggests that RNs’ contributions to case discussions are limited and that patient perspective is generally underrepresented. Our aim was to explore RNs’ views of the prerequisites for and barriers to the inclusion of the patient perspective in MDTMs in Swedish cancer care.

Methods

Data were collected from four focus group interviews with 22 RNs who worked as contact nurses in Swedish cancer care. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using inductive content analysis.

Results

The analysis identified two categories and five subcategories. The participants presented different views and expressed ambivalence about the patient perspective in MDTMs. Subcategories were related to medical versus holistic perspectives, the added value of patient perspective, and possibilities for patient contributions. The participants also discussed prerequisites for the patient perspective to be considered in MDTM decision-making process, with subcategories related to structures promoting attention to the patient perspective and determinants of RNs’ contributions to case discussions in MDTMs.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates various views related to the patient perspective in MDTMs and identifies a great need to clarify the RN’s role. Our results indicate that if enhanced presentation of the patient perspective in MDTMs is desired, key information points and structures must be established to collect and present relevant patient-related information.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature, 2022. Vol. 21, no 1, article id 350
National Category
Nursing
Research subject
The Human Perspective in Care
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-29324DOI: 10.1186/s12912-022-01127-2ISI: 000896582200001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85143607884OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-29324DiVA, id: diva2:1728068
Funder
Lund UniversityAvailable from: 2023-01-17 Created: 2023-01-17 Last updated: 2024-07-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Lindahl, Berit

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rosell, LinnLindahl, Berit
By organisation
Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare
In the same journal
BMC Nursing
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 25 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf