Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Patterns of heavy metal resistant bacterial community succession influenced by biochar amendment during poultry manure composting
College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, PR China.
College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, PR China.
College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, PR China.
College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, PR China.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Journal of Hazardous Materials, ISSN 0304-3894, E-ISSN 1873-3336, Vol. 420, article id 126562Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Sustainable development
According to the author(s), the content of this publication falls within the area of sustainable development.
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this study was to investigate the heavy metal resistant bacteria (HMRB) community succession and bacterial activity in poultry manure (PM) composting. Five different concentration of chicken manure biochar (CMB) at 0%, 2%, 4%, 6%, and 10% on a dry weight basis was applied with initial feedstock (poultry manure + wheat straw) and indicated with T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5. In addition, high-throughput sequencing, principal coordinate analysis, and correlation analysis were used to analyze the evolution of HMRB communities during composting. The study indicated that crucial phyla were Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes. The bacterial diversity in the CMB amendment treatment was higher than in the control treatment, and T4 treatment has the highest among all CMB applied treatments. Moreover, results from CCA indicated that T4 and T5 treatments quickly enters the high-temperature period which is maintained for 5 days, and is significantly positively correlated with Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria. These findings offer insight into potential strategies to understand the succession of HMRBs during PM reuse. Overall, the above results show the addition of 6% biochar (T4) was potentially beneficial to enrich the abundance of bacterial community to improve composting environment quality and composting efficiency. In addition, effective to immobilized the heavy metals and HMRB in the end product.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021. Vol. 420, article id 126562
Keywords [en]
Heavy metal resistant bacteria, Chicken manure biochar, Poultry manure, Community succession, MICROBIAL COMMUNITY, WASTE
National Category
Microbiology
Research subject
Resource Recovery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-26828DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126562ISI: 000707925100001PubMedID: 34252662Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85110206348OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-26828DiVA, id: diva2:1606868
Available from: 2021-10-28 Created: 2021-10-28 Last updated: 2022-01-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Taherzadeh, Mohammad JMukesh Kumar, Awasthi

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Taherzadeh, Mohammad JMukesh Kumar, Awasthi
By organisation
Faculty of Textiles, Engineering and Business
In the same journal
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Microbiology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 40 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf