Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluation of dZ/dt Complex Subtypes vs Ensemble Averaging Method for Estimation of Left Ventricular Ejection Time from ICG Recording
University of Borås, Faculty of Textiles, Engineering and Business. University of Sciences and Technology Houari Boumediene. (Department of Textile Technology)
University of Borås, Faculty of Textiles, Engineering and Business. University of Sciences and Technology Houari Boumediene. (Department of Textile Technology)
University of Sciences and Technology Houari Boumediene.
University of Borås, Faculty of Textiles, Engineering and Business. Karolinska Institute. (Department of Textile Technology)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6995-967X
2021 (English)In: 8th European Medical and Biological Engineering ConferenceProceedings of the EMBEC 2020, November 29 – December 3, 2020 Portorož, Slovenia / [ed] Tomaz Jarm; Aleksandra Cvetkoska; Samo Mahnič-Kalamiza; Damijan Miklavcic, Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH , 2021, p. 502-509Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Impedance cardiography (ICG) was discovered nearly half a century ago, being proposed as noninvasive monitoring method for estimation of several hemodynamics parameter. Despite of nearly 5 decades of clinical research and use there is still certain controversy about its performance when estimating Left Ventricular Ejection Time (LVET). This work present a comparison between using the different ICG subtype waveform and the ensemble averaged (EA) method to calculate the LVET. The ICG has been recorded from four volunteers, and the LVET parameter has been calculated using the two approaches. The result shows that each volunteer have different percentage of subtypes, and the mean relative error between the two approaches for estimation of LVET varied between 0.62 to 2.9% with an average mean absolute percentage error of 18,02% ranging between 13.82 to 18.42%. © 2021, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH , 2021. p. 502-509
Keywords [en]
Ensemble averaging, Impedance cardiography, LVET, Subtype waveform, X point, Biochemical engineering, Ensemble-averaged, Left ventricular, Mean absolute percentage error, Mean relative error, Non-invasive monitoring, Wave forms, Clinical research
National Category
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-26019DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-64610-3_57Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85097594826ISBN: 9783030646097 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-26019DiVA, id: diva2:1579143
Conference
8th European Medical and Biological Engineering Conference, EMBEC 2020, Portorož, Slovenia, 29 November - 3 December, 2020.
Available from: 2021-07-08 Created: 2021-07-08 Last updated: 2025-02-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Hafid, AbdelakramBenouar, SaraSeoane, Fernando

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hafid, AbdelakramBenouar, SaraSeoane, Fernando
By organisation
Faculty of Textiles, Engineering and Business
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 103 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf