Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Delays in emergency orthopaedic procedures: a single-centre experience of 36,017 consecutive cases over seven years
2018 (English)Conference paper, Poster (with or without abstract) (Refereed)
Description
Abstract [en]

Emergency surgery is unplanned by definition and patients are scheduled for surgery with minimal preparation. Some patients who have sustained emergency orthopaedic trauma or other conditions must be operated on immediately or within a few hours, while others can wait until the hospital’s resources permit or the patients’ health status has been optimised. This affect the prioritisation procedures for both emergency and elective surgery and might result in waiting lists, not only for planned procedures but also for emergencies. Purpose of the retrospective, observational, single-centre study was to evaluate and describe for the number and reasons of delays, as well as waiting times in emergency orthopaedic surgery using data derived from the hospital’s records and registers. All the emergency patients scheduled for emergency surgery whose procedures were rescheduled and delayed between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2013 were studied. We found that 24% (8,474) of the 36,017 patients scheduled for emergency surgeries were delayed and rescheduled at least once, some several times. 80 % of these delays were due to organisational causes. 21 % of all the delayed patients had surgery within 24 hours, whilst 41% waited for more than 24 hours, up to three days. Much of the clinic’s emergency orthopaedic procedures were rescheduled and delayed and the majority of the delays were related to organisational reasons. The results can be interpreted in two ways; first, organisational reasons are avoidable and the potential for improvement is great and, secondly and most importantly, the delays might negatively affect patient outcomes. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018.
National Category
Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-25320OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-25320DiVA, id: diva2:1544256
Conference
NORNA, Nordic Operating Room Nurses Association Congress 2018, Come together - Building Bridges in Perioperative Nursing, Stockholm, Sweden, November 29 – 30, 2018.
Available from: 2021-04-14 Created: 2021-04-14 Last updated: 2021-04-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Caesar, Ulla

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Caesar, Ulla
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 45 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf