Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Research that Facilitates Praxis and Praxis Development
Tampere University, Finland.
Monash University, Australia.
University of Borås, Faculty of Librarianship, Information, Education and IT.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1424-6063
2020 (English)In: Pedagogy, Education, and Praxis in Critical Times / [ed] K. Mahon, C. Edwards-Grooves, S Francisco, M. Kaukko, S. Kemmis, & K., Springer Publishing Company, 2020, p. 39-63Chapter in book (Refereed)
Sustainable development
According to the author(s), the content of this publication falls within the area of sustainable development.
Abstract [en]

This chapter draws on an integrative literature review of the corpus of Pedagogy, Education and Praxis (PEP) publications between 2008 and 2018, examining research conducted in and for praxis, that is, research that helps us to understand and facilitate praxis. The chapter maps some of the central foundations that cut across educational research facilitating praxis and praxis development, including the theory of practice architectures and educational action research. It also touches upon approaches that, despite their connections with praxis, appear to be less common. The chapter also deliberates on the conditions under which research in and for praxis might be conducted, and by whom, in different educational settings and national contexts. The findings show that research in and for praxis is possible via multiple approaches and various positionalities, as long as the aim is to go beyond understanding praxis into realising its possibilities in actual educational sites. These multiple approaches include “insider”, “outsider”, and “in-between” researcher locations. Overall, our review reveals that the rich and varied works on, with, and for praxis discussed in the chapter can provide a powerful armoury with which to speak back to increasingly homogenised and homogenising research approaches in education. It also suggests that the emergence of new ideas and less dominant theories has the potential to further facilitate the (re)imagining of new possibilities for research/praxis development.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Publishing Company, 2020. p. 39-63
National Category
Pedagogical Work
Research subject
Teacher Education and Education Work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-24165DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-6926-5_3Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85136463107ISBN: 978-981-15-6925-8 (print)ISBN: 978-981-15-6926-5 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-24165DiVA, id: diva2:1505511
Available from: 2020-12-01 Created: 2020-12-01 Last updated: 2024-02-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Langelotz, Lill

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Langelotz, Lill
By organisation
Faculty of Librarianship, Information, Education and IT
Pedagogical Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 195 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf