System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Bioprocessing strategies to increase the protein fraction of Rhizopus oryzae biomass using fish industry sidestreams
University of Borås, Faculty of Textiles, Engineering and Business. (Swedish Centre for Resource Recovery)
University of Borås, Faculty of Textiles, Engineering and Business. (Swedish Centre for Resource Recovery)
University of Borås, Faculty of Textiles, Engineering and Business. (Swedish Centre for Resource Recovery)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4887-2433
2020 (English)In: Waste Management, ISSN 0956-053X, E-ISSN 1879-2456, Vol. 113, p. 261-269Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The sidestreams produced during fish processing end in a separation tank where the resulting fractions follow biogas production or wastewater treatment. These streams can alternatively be used for production of protein-rich fungal biomass for e.g. fish feed applications, a product in increasing demand. These streams and upper streams originated during fish processing were used in this study for production of biomass using the edible filamentous fungus Rhizopus oryzae. The COD of the streams varied between 11 and 54 kg/m3 and, after fungal conversion of organic matter into protein-rich biomass and separation, a reduction of 34–69% was achieved. The stream origin had an effect on the final production and composition of the fungal biomass: 480 kg of biomass containing 33% protein per ton of COD were produced after cultivation in the separation tank streams, while 220 kg of biomass containing 62% protein per ton of COD were produced in upper sidestreams with lower amounts of suspended solids. Changing the initial pH (6.1–6.5) to 5.0 had a negative influence on the amount of biomass produced while medium supplementation had no influence. Thus, fish processing sidestreams can be diverted from biogas production and wastewater treatment to the production of protein-rich biomass for feed applications. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2020. Vol. 113, p. 261-269
Keywords [en]
Biological conversion, Edible fungal biomass, Fish processing, Protein, Rhizopus oryzae, Waste treatment
National Category
Natural Sciences
Research subject
Resource Recovery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-23738DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.06.005ISI: 000549433000001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85086370136OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-23738DiVA, id: diva2:1462509
Available from: 2020-08-30 Created: 2020-08-30 Last updated: 2022-01-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(602 kB)199 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 602 kBChecksum SHA-512
4e762bbc251e2d2c5f3439bdb90a1505af733d9afd6f37b57ae873daedcf675826a308d362226343a68184e734385ddcf6d45acd0d47b264f4d7cc5077507472
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Sar, TanerFerreira, JorgeTaherzadeh, Mohammad J

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sar, TanerFerreira, JorgeTaherzadeh, Mohammad J
By organisation
Faculty of Textiles, Engineering and Business
In the same journal
Waste Management
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 199 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 183 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf