Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Fermentation inhibitors in ethanol and biogas processes and strategies to counteract their effects
Department of Food and Agricultural Product Technology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Department of Food Science and Technology, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia.
Department of Food and Agricultural Product Technology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Department of Chemical Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran.
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)Book (Other academic)
Sustainable development
According to the author(s), the content of this publication falls within the area of sustainable development.
Abstract [en]

Bioethanol and biogas production are the most common fermentation process to convert organic waste into energy. The presence of inhibitory compounds affects the performance of fermentation, leading to lower product yield. The inhibitory compounds for bioethanol and biogas might be different due to the different types of microorganism used for the process, in which bioethanol process uses a single culture, while biogas process uses a mix culture of microorganisms. However, in general, the inhibitors can be classified into three groups. The first group is natural inhibitor exist in the raw material such as flavor compounds or chemical compounds that contaminates available in the waste stream such as heavy metals, light metals, antibiotics, and pesticides. The second group is inhibitor that forms during the fermentation process such as ammonia, sulfide, and ethanol. The third group is inhibitor which is formed during the pretreatment of lignocellulose such as furfural, hydroxymethylfurfural, phenolic compounds, and humic acid. The minimum inhibitory concentration and inhibition mechanism will be discussed in this chapter. The inhibition effects can be reduced or removed by choosing a suitable concentration of the substrates and choosing a proper method for the pretreatment and/or hydrolysis steps. When the toxic compounds are available in the substrate, detoxification could be an option, although it has some expenses and might lead to partial loss of sugars. However, choosing a right strategy for the fermentation by selecting a suitable process, for example, fed-batch or continuous mode with high cell density or encapsulated cells, using a tolerant organism or an organism that can convert the inhibitors, might avoid the necessity of detoxification.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier , 2019.
Keywords [en]
Inhibitor, Bioethanol, Biogas, Fermentation, Inhibitors, Detoxification
National Category
Industrial Biotechnology
Research subject
Resource Recovery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-23372DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-816856-1.00020-8Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85081364415ISBN: 9780128168561 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-23372DiVA, id: diva2:1445464
Available from: 2020-06-23 Created: 2020-06-23 Last updated: 2024-02-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Wikandari, RachmaTaherzadeh, Mohammad J

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wikandari, RachmaTaherzadeh, Mohammad J
By organisation
Faculty of Textiles, Engineering and Business
Industrial Biotechnology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 221 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf