Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Katalogisering i Libris XL: En studie om katalogisatörers praktik, kunskap och lärande
2020 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
Cataloging in Libris XL : A study about catalogers’ practice, knowledge and learning (English)
Abstract [en]

The aim of the study was to investigate catalogers’ practice, knowledge and learning, and if and how previous experience makes a difference and also investigate the need for knowledge in underlying conceptual models. The National Library of Sweden (KB) has developed the new system Libris XL which is based on a new user interface, new conceptual models and the use of linked data. I have performed observations and interviews with six catalogers working in public libraries and university libraries. Qualitative content analysis has been conducted. The concepts of catalogers’ repertoire and community learning constitutes the theoretical framework of this study. The need for knowledge in FRBR is not seen as absolutely necessary but catalogers see the conceptual model as interesting and helpful but also confusing since FRBR´s four levels are not used in the interface. Experience from previous cataloging system was not considered as an advantage in the early transition from Voyager to Libris XL but when they have learned the interface, the overall knowledge in cataloging can be useful in making resource description richer. Colleagues both at own and others’ workplace, seem to play an important role in learning and working in Libris XL and discussions are held in daily conversations and planned meetings. MARC21 is still useful to know. Tools for discussion online such as Microsoft Teams and Libris Supportforum was also important particularly in the early stages of transition. KB´s own resources such as instruction videos, texts about RDA and help texts, as well as university library manuals are used. Seeking answers in existing RDA-posts is also a strategy. RDA Toolkit is seldom used.  

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020.
Keywords [sv]
katalogisering, Libris XL, katalogiseringsteori, repertoar, lärandegemenskap
National Category
Information Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-22866OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-22866DiVA, id: diva2:1395289
Available from: 2020-02-26 Created: 2020-02-21 Last updated: 2020-02-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1515 kB)790 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1515 kBChecksum SHA-512
59a476f38edb7d6f6427d9c6526154a1cef957f375d981d1db509cc1c87ac10511e0d078f26708a70a4bff42d8e9a7796792b315fe8aa467e9169454753d2555
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Information Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 791 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 836 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf