Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Drone delivery of an automated external defibrillator - a mixed method simulation study of bystander experience.
Department of Medicine, Centre for Resuscitation Science, Karolinska Institute.
Västerbotten Emergency Medical Services.
Department of Medicine, Centre for Resuscitation Science, Karolinska Institute.
Department of Medicine, Centre for Resuscitation Science, Karolinska Institute.
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, ISSN 1757-7241, E-ISSN 1757-7241, Vol. 27, no 1, article id 40Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) affects some 275,000 individuals in Europe each year. Time from collapse to defibrillation is essential for survival. As emergency medical services (EMS) response times in Sweden have increased, novel methods are needed to facilitate early treatment. Unmanned aerial vehicles (i.e. drones) have potential to deliver automated external defibrillators (AED). The aim of this simulation study was to explore bystanders' experience of a simulated OHCA-situation where a drone delivers an AED and how the situation is affected by having one or two bystanders onsite.

METHODS: This explorative simulation study used a mixed methodology describing bystanders' experiences of retrieving an AED delivered by a drone in simulated OHCA situations. Totally eight participants were divided in two groups of bystanders a) alone or b) in pairs and performed CPR on a manikin for 5 minutes after which an AED was delivered by a drone at 50 m from the location. Qualitative data from observations, interviews of participants and video recordings were analysed using content analysis alongside descriptive data on time delays during bystander interaction.

RESULTS: Three categories of bystander experiences emerged: 1) technique and preparedness, 2) support through conversation with the dispatcher, and 3) aid and decision-making. The main finding was that retrieval of an AED as delivered by a drone was experienced as safe and feasible for bystanders. None of the participants hesitated to retrieve the AED; instead they experienced it positive, helpful and felt relief upon AED-drone arrival and were able to retrieve and attach the AED to a manikin. Interacting with the AED-drone was perceived as less difficult than performing CPR or handling their own mobile phone during T-CPR. Single bystander simulation introduced a significant hands-off interval when retrieving the AED, a period lasting 94 s (range 75 s-110 s) with one participant compared to 0 s with two participants.

CONCLUSION: The study shows that it made good sense for bystanders to interact with a drone in this simulated suspected OHCA. Bystanders experienced delivery of AED as safe and feasible. This has potential implications, and further studies on bystanders' experiences in real cases of OHCA in which a drone delivers an AED are therefore necessary.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019. Vol. 27, no 1, article id 40
Keywords [en]
AED, Bystander experience, CPR, Defibrillator, Drone, OHCA, UAV
National Category
Other Medical Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-16023DOI: 10.1186/s13049-019-0622-6ISI: 000464226700002PubMedID: 30961651Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85064119066OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-16023DiVA, id: diva2:1306669
Available from: 2019-04-24 Created: 2019-04-24 Last updated: 2019-04-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1598 kB)7 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1598 kBChecksum SHA-512
7adb04e4c3dab30a197b700acce420831c9289387892ac8a61d8695f1edfc462a775bfd1ebb19dbd21f0df474e7c2936738c7dfe0145fc1fd969c7bb9372db5d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records BETA

Andersson Hagiwara, Magnus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Andersson Hagiwara, Magnus
By organisation
Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Other Medical Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 7 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 217 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf