Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comprehensiveness of national bibliographic databases for social sciences and humanities: Findings from a European survey
Centre for R&D Monitoring (ECOOM), Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Antwerp.
Federation of Finnish Learned Societies.
Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation,Research and Education.
Centre for R&D Monitoring (ECOOM), Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Antwerp.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Research Evaluation, ISSN 0958-2029, E-ISSN 1471-5449, Vol. 1, no 13, article id rvy016Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

This article provides an overview of national bibliographic databases that include data on research output within social sciences and humanities (SSH) in Europe. We focus on the comprehensiveness of the database content. Compared to the data from commercial databases such as Web of Science and Scopus, data from national bibliographic databases (e.g. Flemish Academic Bibliographic Database for the SSH (VABB-SHW) in Belgium, Current Research Information System in Norway (CRISTIN)) are more comprehensive and may, therefore, be better fit for bibliometric analyses. Acknowledging this, several countries within Europe maintain national bibliographic databases; detailed and comparative information about their content, however, has been limited. In autumn 2016, we launched a survey to acquire an overview of national bibliographic databases for SSH in Europe and Israel. Surveying 41 countries (responses received from 39 countries), we identified 21 national bibliographic databases for SSH. Further, we acquired a more detailed description of 13 databases, with a focus on their comprehensiveness. Findings indicate that even though the content of national bibliographic databases is diverse, it is possible to delineate a subset that is similar across databases. At the same time, it is apparent that differences in national bibliographic databases are often bound to differences in country-specific arrangements. Considering this, we highlight implications to bibliometric analyses based on data from national bibliographic databases and outline several aspects that may be taken into account in the development of existing national bibliographic databases for SSH or the design of new ones.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. Vol. 1, no 13, article id rvy016
Keywords [en]
national bibliographic databases, social sciences, humanities
National Category
Information Studies
Research subject
Library and Information Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-15411DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvy016OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-15411DiVA, id: diva2:1267716
Available from: 2018-12-03 Created: 2018-12-03 Last updated: 2019-01-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Nelhans, Gustaf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nelhans, Gustaf
By organisation
Faculty of Librarianship, Information, Education and IT
In the same journal
Research Evaluation
Information Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 97 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf