Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Definitions, measurements and prevalence of fear of childbirth: a systematic review
University of Borås, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare. University of Gothenburg.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3195-5702
University of Gothenburg.
University of Gothenburg.
University of Gothenburg.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, ISSN 1471-2393, E-ISSN 1471-2393, Vol. 18, no 1, article id 29329526Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background

Fear of Childbirth (FOC) is a common problem affecting women’s health and wellbeing, and a common reason for requesting caesarean section. The aims of this review were to summarise published research on prevalence of FOC in childbearing women and how it is defined and measured during pregnancy and postpartum, and to search for useful measures of FOC, for research as well as for clinical settings.

Methods

Five bibliographic databases in March 2015 were searched for published research on FOC, using a protocol agreed a priori. The quality of selected studies was assessed independently by pairs of authors. Prevalence data, definitions and methods of measurement were extracted independently from each included study by pairs of authors. Finally, some of the country rates were combined and compared.

Results

In total, 12,188 citations were identified and screened by title and abstract; 11,698 were excluded and full-text of 490 assessed for analysis. Of these, 466 were excluded leaving 24 papers included in the review, presenting prevalence of FOC from nine countries in Europe, Australia, Canada and the United States. Various definitions and measurements of FOC were used. The most frequently-used scale was the W-DEQ with various cut-off points describing moderate, severe/intense and extreme/phobic fear. Different 3-, 4-, and 5/6 point scales and visual analogue scales were also used. Country rates (as measured by seven studies using W-DEQ with ≥85 cut-off point) varied from 6.3 to 14.8%, a significant difference (chi-square = 104.44, d.f. = 6, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Rates of severe FOC, measured in the same way, varied in different countries. Reasons why FOC might differ are unknown, and further research is necessary. Future studies on FOC should use the W-DEQ tool with a cut-off point of ≥85, or a more thoroughly tested version of the FOBS scale, or a three-point scale measurement of FOC using a single question as ‘Are you afraid about the birth?’ In this way, valid comparisons in research can be made. Moreover, validation of a clinical tool that is more focussed on FOC alone, and easier than the longer W-DEQ, for women to fill in and clinicians to administer, is required.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. Vol. 18, no 1, article id 29329526
Keywords [en]
FOBS, Fear of childbirth, Prevalence, Request for caesarean section, Systematic review, W-DEQ
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Research subject
Människan i vården
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-13554DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-1659-7PubMedID: 29329526OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-13554DiVA, id: diva2:1175082
Available from: 2018-01-17 Created: 2018-01-17 Last updated: 2018-04-16

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(556 kB)5 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 556 kBChecksum SHA-512
77da0c87961f2adf649d7704968763c363168c0fc69b20e10ac02e14e027ad98ce8ebdcc766fe54cb6432a1c39573418d9c5d0d653691a46d0ca4aef1435e521
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Nilsson, Christina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nilsson, Christina
By organisation
Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare
In the same journal
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 5 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 96 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf