Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Practice architectures of university education
University of Borås, Faculty of Librarianship, Information, Education and IT.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8945-2235
2017 (English)In: Practice theory perspectives on pedagogy and education / [ed] Peter Grootenboer, Christine Edwards-Groves, Sarojni Choy, Singapore: Springer, 2017, p. 107-141Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This chapter aims to challenge the narrative of the university in decline in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries, by showing how earlier forms of university life and practice persist within emerging forms. It uses the resources of practice theory — more precisely, the theory of practice architectures — to illuminate the analysis. The chapter proceeds in five main steps. First, the theory of practice architectures is outlined. Second, three vignettes of Australian university life in different eras (1964, 1987, 2015) are presented. These give a sense of the changes underway in Australian university life and practice; each is briefly contextualised by reference to a specific university at the time, and in relation to wider Australian culture, economy, and society and politics. Third, the notion of ‘practice landscapes’ is used to interpret and characterise the ‘look and feel’ of Australian university life and practice across the three periods being explored. We describe the university of 1964 as the juridical university, the university of 1987 as the negotiated university, and the university of 2015 as theentrepreneurial university. Fourth, we return to the notion of practice architectures to show how multiple forms of university life and practice have coexisted over time, with earlier forms persisting within later ones. Finally, we draw the argument to its conclusion, namely, that change in the life and practice of (some) Australian universities 1964–2015 is not a linear progress (or regress) in which earlier forms of the university are destroyed and replaced, but, rather, a complex process in which earlier forms are sedimented and displaced within contemporary university life and practice as a contested terrain. We think this alternative perspective offers scope and hope for transformative action for recovery and renewal in the Australian university.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Singapore: Springer, 2017. p. 107-141
Keywords [en]
higher education, university life, practice architectures
National Category
Pedagogy
Research subject
Teacher Education and Education Work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-12159DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-3130-4_6ISBN: 978-981-10-3128-1 (print)ISBN: 978-981-10-3130-4 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-12159DiVA, id: diva2:1173820
Available from: 2018-01-14 Created: 2018-01-14 Last updated: 2018-01-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full texthttps://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-10-3130-4_6

Authority records BETA

Mahon, Kathleen

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mahon, Kathleen
By organisation
Faculty of Librarianship, Information, Education and IT
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 11 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf