Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Indicators as judgment devices: An empirical study of citizen bibliometrics in research evaluation
University of Borås, Faculty of Librarianship, Information, Education and IT.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1504-8395
Leiden University.
2017 (English)In: Research Evaluation, ISSN 0958-2029, E-ISSN 1471-5449, Vol. 3, no 1, p. 169-180Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A researcher’s number of publications has been a fundamental merit in the competition for academic positions since the late 18th century. Today, the simple counting of publications has been supplemented with a whole range of bibliometric indicators, which supposedly not only measures the volume of research but also its impact. In this study, we investigate how bibliometrics are used for evaluating the impact and quality of publications in two specific settings: biomedicine and economics. Our study exposes the various metrics used in external evaluations of candidates for academic positions at Swedish universities. Moreover, we show how different bibliometric indicators, both explicitly and implicitly, are employed to assess and rank candidates. Our findings contribute to a further understanding of bibliometric indicators as ‘judgment devices’ that are employed in evaluating individuals and their published works within specific fields. We also show how ‘expertise’ in using bibliometrics for evaluative purposes is negotiated at the interface between domain knowledge and skills in using indicators. In line with these results, we propose that the use of metrics we report is best described as a form of ‘citizen bibliometrics’—an underspecified term which we build upon in the article.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 3, no 1, p. 169-180
Keyword [en]
citizen bibliometrics, economics, biomedicine, judgment devices, Journal Impact Factor, h-index.
National Category
Information Studies
Research subject
Library and Information Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-12561DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvx018ISI: 000405419200002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85024118578OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-12561DiVA: diva2:1139715
Projects
Measuring ScienceScience audited
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2013-7368Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, SGO14-1153:1
Available from: 2017-09-08 Created: 2017-09-08 Last updated: 2017-12-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(236 kB)2 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 236 kBChecksum SHA-512
43173cef04a9d4cee22db03344f7a6c78dc7865815387b20880ec3162cd9e4fafd388011825293515c1c6a4452fa4b9c6fb50e4f9fa592f7a839e6ee6ab806b0
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Hammarfelt, Björn

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hammarfelt, Björn
By organisation
Faculty of Librarianship, Information, Education and IT
In the same journal
Research Evaluation
Information Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 2 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 148 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf