Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Best Practice in IT Service Management: Experienced Strengths and Weaknesses of using ITIL
University of Borås, Faculty of Librarianship, Information, Education and IT. (InnovationLab)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1452-4206
Tregamma.
2016 (English)In: International Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance, 2016, p. 60-67Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This paper focuses on the management of IT services and especially on best practices in the IT sector. Successful organizations must continuously improve their business management, including their IT management, in order to retain competitive advantages, and thus they need to reflect upon and improve their ways of working. One important aspect of this is usage of best practices. Best practices are toolsets or frameworks for the management of business and IT alignment, and their purpose is to improve the quality of IT services through delivering superior results compared to other frameworks, time after time. The most cited, globally recognized and adopted best practice is Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL). The problem we address is that there exist contradictory claims concerning the usefulness of best practices. Due to these contradictory claims, the purpose of this paper is to learn more about the strengths and weaknesses of ITIL. To fulfill the purpose of this paper, we have conducted a qualitative study where we have collected empirical experiences from use of ITIL. We have interviewed 15 IT managers and IT consultants about their experiences of using ITIL.

We can conclude that previous findings are fragmented and thus we have presented a coherent and structured collection of empirical experiences categorized as strengths and weaknesses. The identified strengths are: high reliability, improved cost efficiency, a tool for communication and support for structured work. The identified weaknesses are: lack of concretion, adaptation difficulties, being too comprehensive and having high costs. These strengths and weaknesses have to be managed in accordance with the situation at hand. We believe that our findings can contribute in two ways: 1) they consist of a coherent and structured overview informing about both strengths and weaknesses, and 2) the weaknesses can be used as requirements for a redesign of ITIL. Our study has in a cumulative way advanced the state-of-the-art by adding new knowledge based on empirical data.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. p. 60-67
Keywords [en]
IT Management, IT Service Management, Best Practice, ITIL.
National Category
Computer and Information Sciences Information Systems
Research subject
Bussiness and IT
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-11333Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84969256451ISBN: 978-191081084-2 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-11333DiVA, id: diva2:1055074
Conference
ICMLG, St. Petersburg, April 14-15, 2016
Funder
Knowledge FoundationAvailable from: 2016-12-11 Created: 2016-12-11 Last updated: 2018-01-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Scopus

Authority records

Cronholm, Stefan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Cronholm, Stefan
By organisation
Faculty of Librarianship, Information, Education and IT
Computer and Information SciencesInformation Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 1713 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf