Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Quantified academic selves: the gamification of research through social networking services
Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-1504-8395
CWTS, Leiden University.
CWTS, Leiden University.
2016 (engelsk)Inngår i: Information research, ISSN 1368-1613, E-ISSN 1368-1613, Vol. 21, nr 2Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction. Our study critically engages with techniques of self-quantification in contemporary academia, by demonstrating how social networking services enact research and scholarly communication as a 'game'.

Method. The empirical part of the study involves an analysis of two leading platforms: Impactstory and ResearchGate. Observed qualities of these platforms will be analyzed in detail with concrete examples of gaming features in focus. Subsequently, we relate the development of these digital platforms to a broader 'quantified self movement'. Special attention will also be paid to how these platforms contribute to a general quantification of the academic (authorial) self. 

Theory. Theoretically we relate the 'gamification' of research to neoliberal ideas about markets and competition. Our analysis then extends to long-standing and fundamental ideas about self-betterment expressed in the philosophy of Peter Sloterdijk. 

Findings. Our study shows how social networking services, such as ResearchGate and Impactstory, enact researchers as 'entrepreneurs of themselves' in a marketplace of ideas, and the quantification of scholarly reputation to a single number plays an important role in this process. Moreover, the technologies that afford these types of quantifiable interactions affect the 'unfolding ontology' of algorithmic academic identities. 

Conclusions. The gamification of quantified academic selves intensifies the competitive nature of scholarship, it commodifies academic outputs and it might lead to goal displacement and cheating. However, self-quantification might also serve as a liberating and empowering activity for the individual researcher as alternative measures of impact and productivity are provided by these platforms.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2016. Vol. 21, nr 2
Emneord [en]
Quantification, altmetrics, bibliometrics, neoliberalism, gamificiation
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-10049OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-10049DiVA, id: diva2:938699
Prosjekter
Measuring Science
Forskningsfinansiär
Swedish Research Council, 2013-7368Tilgjengelig fra: 2016-06-17 Laget: 2016-06-17 Sist oppdatert: 2017-11-28bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

http://InformationR.net/ir/21-2/SM1.html

Personposter BETA

Hammarfelt, Björn

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Hammarfelt, Björn
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Information research

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric

urn-nbn
Totalt: 991 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf