System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Clinical Frailty Scale score is a predictor of short-, mid- and long-term mortality in critically ill older adults (≥ 70 years) admitted to the emergency department: an observational study
Department of Health, Medicine, and Caring Sciences, Unit of Health Care Analysis, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Research and Development, NU Hospital Group, Trollhättan, Sweden.
Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, and AstraZeneca Gothenburg, GothenburgMölndal, Sweden.
Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, and AstraZeneca Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
Department of Research and Development, NU Hospital Group, Trollhättan, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: BMC Geriatrics, E-ISSN 1471-2318, Vol. 24, article id 852Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background

The estimated prognos of a patient might influence the expected benefit/risk ratio of different interventions. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score as an independent predictor of short-, mid- and long-term mortality in critically ill older adults (aged ≥ 70) admitted to the emergency department (ED). 

Methods

This is a retrospective, single-center, observational study, involving critically ill older adults, recruited consecutively in an ED. All patients were followed for 6.5–7.5 years. The effect of CFS score on mortality was adjusted for the following confounders: age, sex, Charlson’s Comorbidity Index, individual comorbidities and vital parameters. All patients (n = 402) were included in the short- and mid-term analyses, while patients discharged alive (n = 302) were included in the long-term analysis. Short-term mortality was analysed with logistic regression, mid- and long-term mortality with log rank test and Cox proportional hazard models. The CFS was treated as a continuous variable in the primary analyses, and as a categorical variable in completing analyses.

Results

There was a significant association between mortality at 30 days after ED admission and CFS score, adjusted OR (95% CI) 2.07 (1.64–2.62), p < 0.0001. There was a significant association between mortality at one year after ED admission and CFS score, adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.75 (1.53–2.01), p < 0.0001. There was a significant association between mortality 6.5–7.5 years after discharge and CFS score, adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.66 (1.46–1.89), p < 0.0001. Adjusted HRs are also reported for long-term mortality, when the CFS was treated as a categorical variable: CFS-score 5 versus 1–4: HR (95% CI) 1.98 (1.27–3.08); 6 versus 1–4: HR (95% CI) 3.60 (2.39–5.44); 7 versus 1–4: HR (95% CI) 3.95 (2.38–6.55); 8–9 versus 1–4: HR (95% CI) 20.08 (9.30–43.38). The completing analyses for short- and mid-term mortality indicated a similar risk-predictive value of the CFS. 

Conclusions

Clinical frailty scale score was independently associated with all-cause short-, mid- and long-term mortality. A nearly doubled risk of death was observed in frail patients. This information is clinically relevant, since individualised treatment and care planning for older adults should consider risk of death in different time perspectives.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. Vol. 24, article id 852
Keywords [en]
Older adults, Emergency department, Predictors, Clinical frailty scale, Mortality
National Category
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Research subject
The Human Perspective in Care
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-32783DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05463-7ISI: 001339929800003PubMedID: 39434029Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85206965318OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-32783DiVA, id: diva2:1911770
Funder
Linköpings universitetAvailable from: 2024-11-08 Created: 2024-11-08 Last updated: 2024-11-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1507 kB)24 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1507 kBChecksum SHA-512
036e06664469775e4986dbb31d31b3189eda5bf47bb5fac0980995a8c50e4f1fadeca3229adb2eb0558c8b02832b004bd0ec6b2643765394ce73001e23b2e2ad
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Herlitz, Johan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Herlitz, Johan
By organisation
Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare
In the same journal
BMC Geriatrics
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 24 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 216 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf