Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
'Getting' it Together In Joint Directed Action
Chalmers, Technology Management and Economics, Quality Sciences.
2009 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis is focused upon investigating how come activities in organizations are sometimes not aligned with an objective at hand, be it a project goal, safety, quality or other. When something goes wrong, where are the answers to be found? In the pursuit to examine these questions further, the aim of the thesis has been to investigate meaning making in action as this can increase an understanding of how actors may continuously align their actions, collective and/or individual, with a common goal – this process here being called Joint Directed Action (JDA). Studying the relational aspects in the two-way process of meaning making and action is claimed to be a neglected area in the research of how actors make sense of their realities. As such much could be gained in terms of understanding how actions unfold by focusing upon these issues.This thesis illustrates how meaning and action constitute a two-way process unfolding in a continuous interpretational-relational process that needs to be given attention in the pursuit of JDA. By being aware of how meaning and action are intertwined, actors can naturally become attentive to contextual cues and how management ‘systems’, such as Quality Assurance Systems, in their enactment become co-authors shaping the organizational landscape. These are important issues in the pursuit of JDA.This thesis provides a method for facilitating meaning making in organizations. Knowledge Overlapping Seminars (KOS) — a conversational tool based upon facilitated reflection and dialogue — is presented as a means to increased awareness of different interpretations of e.g., a project goal due to local realities and identities within an organization. KOS is a method with the aim of increasing efficiency and reliability in organizations by e.g. delimiting misunderstandings and bridging knowledge gaps between local identities. In this thesis KOS has been applied and evaluated in a Six Sigma project.Based upon findings from the studies it is clear that actors, in the pursuit of JDA, are aided by being aware of how they ‘see things’ differently due to local interpretations. It is further argued that actors can pursue JDA by being able to ‘relate’ to one another. The ‘relating to one another’ is based upon an awareness of how the organisational landscape is continuously shaped and re-shaped due to the reflexive relationships among meaning making, identity creation, emotional activities and action within the flow of conversational activity. And so it is contested here that in the co-authoring of relational landscapes characterized by an interrelating which is heedful, attentive and conscientious actors can ‘‘Get’ it Together’ in the continuous pursuit of Joint Directed Action.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Chalmers University , 2009.
Series
Doktorsavhandlingar vid Chalmers tekniska högskola ; Ny serie: 3201
Keywords [en]
emotion, interpretational-relational, language / discourse, Joint Directed Action, meaning making / sensemaking, quality sciences, relational landscape identity, action
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-28525ISBN: 9789173853408 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-28525DiVA, id: diva2:1694129
Opponent
Available from: 2022-09-08 Created: 2022-09-08 Last updated: 2022-09-08Bibliographically approved
List of papers
1. Common concepts for Common Action: Sense Making or Senseless Making in Organizations?
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Common concepts for Common Action: Sense Making or Senseless Making in Organizations?
2003 (English)In: Proceedings from the EGOS Colloqium (European Group for Organization Studies), July 3-5, Copenhagen., 2003Conference paper, Published paper (Other academic)
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-28520 (URN)
Conference
EGOS Colloqium (European Group for Organization Studies), July 3-5, Copenhagen.
Available from: 2022-09-08 Created: 2022-09-08 Last updated: 2022-09-19Bibliographically approved
2. Knowledge Overlapping Seminars: A Conversational Arena for Facilitating Co-construction of Shared Understanding in Projects
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Knowledge Overlapping Seminars: A Conversational Arena for Facilitating Co-construction of Shared Understanding in Projects
2006 (English)In: Proceedings from Quality Management and Organizational development, Proceedings from Quality Management and Organizational development , 2006Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Proceedings from Quality Management and Organizational development, 2006
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-28527 (URN)
Available from: 2022-09-08 Created: 2022-09-08 Last updated: 2022-09-19Bibliographically approved
3. Exploring the epistemological origins of Shewhart’s and Deming’s theory of quality:: Influences from C.I. Lewis’ conceptualistic pragmatism.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Exploring the epistemological origins of Shewhart’s and Deming’s theory of quality:: Influences from C.I. Lewis’ conceptualistic pragmatism.
2009 (English)In: International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, ISSN 1756-669X, E-ISSN 1756-6703, Vol. 1, no 2, p. 160-171Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to explore the epistemological origin of Shewhart's and Deming's ideas in their development of a theory of quality.

Design/methodology/approach

The approach takes the form of a literature review.

Findings

Walter. A. Shewhart's and W. Edwards Deming's ideas concerning a theory of quality originated not solely from insights about variation within statistics but also from the field of philosophy, particularly epistemology. Shewhart and Deming, both seen as quality pioneers, were strongly influenced by the conceptualistic pragmatist Clarence Irving Lewis and his theory of knowledge. This is, and has often been, a neglected connection; however, in today's competitive business environment knowledge and competence have become crucial success factors. Thus, the epistemology‐related origin of their theory of quality has become increasingly interesting and important to explore. First, a summary version of Clarence Irving Lewis' theory of knowledge will be presented here as expressed in his work Mind and the World Order: Outline of a Theory of Knowledge (1929). Second, examples of some important connections between Lewis, and chosen parts of Shewhart's and Deming's theory of quality will be given, for example the plan‐do‐study‐act cycle, operational definitions and profound knowledge. It will also be indicated how the social element in knowledge is emphasised in the works of Lewis, Deming, and Shewhart.

Originality/value

By exploring the epistemological background of Deming's and Shewhart's ideas of a theory of quality, it might be able to better comprehend the profound ideas they left behind and improve the understanding and use of their theory of quality today.

 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 2009
Keywords
Quality concepts, Pragmatism, Knowledge processes, Epistemology, Management gurus, Business history
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-28522 (URN)10.1108/17566690910971436 (DOI)
Available from: 2022-09-08 Created: 2022-09-08 Last updated: 2022-09-19Bibliographically approved
4. The drama of co-construction - exploring 'what goes on' in a conversational arena.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The drama of co-construction - exploring 'what goes on' in a conversational arena.
2009 (English)In: EGOS Colloqium (European Group for Organization Studies), July 2-4, Barcelona., EGOS colloquium , 2009Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
EGOS colloquium, 2009
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-28538 (URN)
Conference
EGOS Colloqium (European Group for Organization Studies), July 2-4, Barcelona.
Available from: 2022-09-08 Created: 2022-09-08 Last updated: 2022-09-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

https://research.chalmers.se/en/publication/101525

Authority records

Mauléon, Christina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mauléon, Christina
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 53 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf