Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) as pain treatment in older persons with suspected hip fractures in prehospital emergency care – A comparative pilot study
University of Borås, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare. Research and Development Centre, Skaraborg Hospital, Skövde, Sweden.
University of Borås, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare.
University of Borås, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare.
University of Borås, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare. (PreHospen)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4139-6235
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: International Emergency Nursing, ISSN 1755-599X, E-ISSN 1878-013X, Vol. 57, article id 101012Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background 

Older persons with a suspected hip fracture and suffering considerable pain are common patients in the emergency medical services (EMS). Pain treatment needs to be improved and fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) can be one option. The purpose of this paper was to analyse prehospital pain in patients with a suspected hip fracture under EMS care and to compare standard treatment and FICB. 

  

Methods 

An evaluation of a retrospective case-control study comprising 135 patients from a pilot project with FICB in an EMS organisation in Sweden. The control patients were matched with FICB patients. Pain was assessed on the arrival of the EMS and on arrival in hospital. 

 

Results 

In all, 27 patients received FICB and 108 had standard pain treatment. There was a significant reduction in pain in both groups. However, there was a more marked reduction in pain among patients who received FICB than in the control group. So, for static pain, 56% experienced a reduction in pain in the FICB group versus 30% among controls (p < 0.01). The corresponding values for dynamic pain were 85% and 59% (p < 0.01). 

  

Conclusion 

FICB can be a good supplement to standard prehospital pain treatment in patients with suspected hip fractures. 

 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021. Vol. 57, article id 101012
Keywords [en]
Hip fractures, Pain, Pain measurement, Nerve blocks, Fascia iliaca compartment block, Emergency medical services
National Category
Nursing
Research subject
The Human Perspective in Care
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-26195DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2021.101012ISI: 000678152700002PubMedID: 34157586Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85109164365OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-26195DiVA, id: diva2:1584482
Available from: 2021-08-12 Created: 2021-08-12 Last updated: 2021-10-21

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(701 kB)217 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 701 kBChecksum SHA-512
c2406e5cbd05433743dd61b06f7aed32e43de6e24c1dc9d1b4fe10b1b858f26d76e4223684d1c9b21c717fa6ede80ac58b5885109cdb93389cdfa5fc6f3cb251
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopushttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X21000501

Authority records

Herlitz, JohanLarsson, Glenn

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Herlitz, JohanLarsson, Glenn
By organisation
Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare
In the same journal
International Emergency Nursing
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 217 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 229 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf