4142434445464744 of 99
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Temporality in academic evaluation: ‘Trajectoral Thinking’ in the Assessment of Biomedical Researchers
University of Borås, Faculty of Librarianship, Information, Education and IT. (KIR)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1504-8395
Oxford University.
Leiden University.
2020 (English)In: Valuation Studies, ISSN 2001-5992, no 1, p. 33-63Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper builds on emerging concerns with how temporality and spatiality unfold in, and order, academic evaluation practices. We unpack how the notion of ‘trajectory’ – a simultaneously prospective and retrospective narrative device permeating contemporary academic evaluation discourses – is mobilized within a particular evaluation site. Materials for our study are drawn from reports commissioned by Swedish universities when hiring for new professors. These texts are authored by external referees who rank and compare candidates, in this case for associate and full professorship positions in biomedicine. By using the theoretical perspective of ‘narrative infrastructures’ we explore how the referee reports mobilize ‘trajectories’ to weave together disparate bits of evidence extracted from the bylines of biomedical researchers’ CVs: publication numbers, impact factors, authorship positions and ‘earning power’. Our analysis finds certain resemblances across reports of what constitutes an ideal candidate’s career trajectory, but none of these are completely identical. We consider how ‘the trajectory’ is evoked as a singularity within this genre of writing, thereby bestowing retrospectively a sense of coherence and purpose on the past performance and prospective development of careers. We discuss the implications of our findings in terms of how ‘trajectorism’ shapes evaluation in academic biomedicine and possibly beyond, and propose suggestions for how this dominant narrative might be challenged.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. no 1, p. 33-63
Keywords [en]
biomedicine, peer review, temporality, spatiality, trajectorism, valuation
National Category
Information Studies
Research subject
Library and Information Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-23034DOI: 10.3384/VS.2001-5992.2020.7.1.33.OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-23034DiVA, id: diva2:1415068
Available from: 2020-03-17 Created: 2020-03-17 Last updated: 2020-03-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1214 kB)9 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1214 kBChecksum SHA-512
1a571a844a64e07209bb0d237c7053d020342fbcd45b8e985208c848f45608b922a41b32d72b735e708f0cbeb20e087dd8735deb6e11500b9d4320eb569aabac
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Hammarfelt, Björn

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hammarfelt, Björn
By organisation
Faculty of Librarianship, Information, Education and IT
Information Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 9 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 9 hits
4142434445464744 of 99
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf