Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluation of Action Design Research
Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT. (InnovationLab)ORCID-id: 0000-0002-1452-4206
Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT. (InnovationLab)ORCID-id: 0000-0002-1452-4206
2019 (engelsk)Inngår i: Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, ISSN 0905-0167, E-ISSN 1901-0990, Vol. 31, nr 2, s. 35-82Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Design science research (DSR) is a legitimate research paradigm in the discipline of information systems (IS). One prominent DSR method is Action Design Research (ADR). The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the ADR method based on empirical experiences from a research project. We have found that the ADR method is highly relevant to an applied discipline such as IS. It creates a bridge between the organisational perspective and the technical perspective of the IT artefact. Moreover, the ADR method supports the dual mission of developing theory and producing knowledge that supports IS practitioners. The findings also include empirical evidence pointing towards a lack of prescriptive guidance with respect to the challenges such as: how to identify appropriate evaluation strategies, how to identify the abstraction mechanisms required to move from the specific-and-unique to the generic-and-abstract, and how to formulate design principles. Although we found adequate support at the macro level, the ADR method needs more detailed support for operationalisation in practice. To address this issue, we propose a number of guidelines that either seek to improve the ADR method or support those who apply ADR.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2019. Vol. 31, nr 2, s. 35-82
Emneord [en]
action design research, ADR, design science research, DSR ADR evaluation
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Handel och IT
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-22448OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-22448DiVA, id: diva2:1386053
Forskningsfinansiär
Knowledge FoundationTilgjengelig fra: 2020-01-16 Laget: 2020-01-16 Sist oppdatert: 2020-01-17bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Full text

Personposter BETA

Cronholm, StefanGöbel, Hannes

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Cronholm, StefanGöbel, Hannes
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric

urn-nbn
Totalt: 7 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf