Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
When is a bystander not a bystander any more? A European Survey.
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein.
National University of Ireland Galway.
Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Prehospital Emergency Medicine (NAKOS).
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein.
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2018 (Engelska)Ingår i: Resuscitation, ISSN 0300-9572, E-ISSN 1873-1570, artikel-id S0300-9572(18)30979-1Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: There is international variation in the rates of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). 'Bystander CPR' is defined in the Utstein definitions, however, differences in interpretation may contribute to the variation reported. The aim of this cross-sectional survey was to understand how the term 'bystander CPR' is interpreted in Emergency Medical Service (EMS) across Europe, and to contribute to a better definition of 'bystander' for future reference.

METHODS: During analysis of the EuReCa ONE study, uncertainty about the definition of a 'bystander' emerged. Sixty scenarios were developed, addressing the interpretation of 'bystander CPR'. An electronic version of the survey was sent to 27 EuReCa National Coordinators, who distributed it to EMS representatives in their countries. Results were descriptively analysed.

RESULTS: 362 questionnaires were received from 23 countries. In scenarios where a layperson arrived on scene by chance and provided CPR, up to 95% of the participants agreed that 'bystander CPR' had been performed. In scenarios that included community response systems, firefighters and/or police personnel, the percentage of agreement that 'bystander CPR' had been performed ranged widely from 16% to 91%. Even in scenarios that explicitly matched examples provided in the Utstein template there was disagreement on the definition.

CONCLUSION: In this survey, the interpretation of 'bystander CPR' varied, particularly when community response systems including laypersons, firefighters, and/or police personnel were involved. It is suggested that the definition of 'bystander CPR' should be revised to reflect changes in treatment of OHCA, and that CPR before arrival of EMS is more accurately described.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2018. artikel-id S0300-9572(18)30979-1
Nyckelord [en]
EuReCa, OHCA, bystander CPR, cardiac arrest, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, resuscitation, resuscitation registry
Nationell ämneskategori
Anestesi och intensivvård
Forskningsämne
Människan i vården; Människan i vården
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-15572DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.12.009ISI: 000459788200011PubMedID: 30572073Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85060852270OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-15572DiVA, id: diva2:1274587
Tillgänglig från: 2019-01-02 Skapad: 2019-01-02 Senast uppdaterad: 2020-01-31Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMedScopus

Personposter BETA

Herlitz, Johan

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Herlitz, Johan
Av organisationen
Akademin för vård, arbetsliv och välfärd
I samma tidskrift
Resuscitation
Anestesi och intensivvård

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 10 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf