Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Att klassificera arkeologi: En komparativ studie av tre klassifikationssystem
Högskolan i Borås, Institutionen Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap / Bibliotekshögskolan.
2004 (Svenska)Självständigt arbete på avancerad nivå (magisterexamen)Studentuppsats (Examensarbete)Alternativ titel
To classify archaeology : A comparative study of three classification systems (Engelska)
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this Masters thesis is to compare classification codes and feature headings of three different universal classification schemes SAB, UDC and DDC, when classifying archaeological literature. The aim is to determine whether a subject analysis of a title generates similar feature headings in the three systems, and to find positive and negative things about each system from an archaeological point of view. The comparison and the analysis of the 22 chosen archaeological monographs showed that the subject analysis of the titles didnt always generate similar feature headings. This could depend on several things, for example different interpretations of the subject analysis of a document, less knowledge about the system and/or the subject, or the fact that its not the same classifier that creates the codes. The study also showed that the different classification systems did treat the subject archaeology a bit differently, and that its difficult to say that one of them is better for classifying archaeological literature. They have all their advantages. My conclusion is that there has to be differences between the feature headings when comparing the systems, primarily because of the structure of the systems and their way to treat archaeology as a subject. Its more important to note that there are divergences between the classification codes within a system.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
University College of Borås. Swedish School of Library and Information Science (SSLIS) , 2004.
Serie
Magisteruppsats i biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap vid Bibliotekshögskolan/Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap, ISSN 1404-0891 ; 2004:55
Nyckelord [en]
library and information science
Nyckelord [sv]
biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap
Nationell ämneskategori
Samhällsvetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-16476Lokalt ID: 2320/1090OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-16476DiVA, id: diva2:1308364
Anmärkning
Uppsatsnivå: DTillgänglig från: 2019-04-30 Skapad: 2019-04-30

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(216 kB)40 nedladdningar
Filinformation
Filnamn FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstorlek 216 kBChecksumma SHA-512
84e73fa0403512643950eaf2e78300511161b7510f8ca08f16e21011418b7a833d89dcac4fafef4d4fc22dfcf4bc579acb6295582f3f4cada55fc2102a620690
Typ fulltextMimetyp application/pdf

Av organisationen
Institutionen Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap / Bibliotekshögskolan
Samhällsvetenskap

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 40 nedladdningar
Antalet nedladdningar är summan av nedladdningar för alla fulltexter. Det kan inkludera t.ex tidigare versioner som nu inte längre är tillgängliga.

urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

urn-nbn
Totalt: 5 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf