Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluation of the Information Systems Research Framework: Empirical Evidence from a Design Science Research Project
Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT. (InnovationLab)ORCID-id: 0000-0002-1452-4206
Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT. (InnovationLab)
2016 (Engelska)Ingår i: Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, ISSN 1566-6379, E-ISSN 1566-6379, Vol. 19, nr 3, s. 157-167Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Submitted
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this paper is to provide empirical evidence that the design science framework Information System Research (ISR) works in practice. More than ten years has passed since ISR was published in the well-cited article ‘Design Science in Information Systems Research’. However, there is no thoroughly documented evaluation of ISR based on primary data. That is, existing evaluations are based on reconstructions of prior studies conducted for other purposes. To use an existing data set to answer new or extended research questions means to conduct a secondary analysis. We point to several risks related to secondary analyses and claim that popular design science research frameworks should be based on primary data. In this paper, we present an evaluation consisting of empirical experiences based on primary data. We have systematically collected experiences from a three-year research project and we present ting of both strengths and weaknesses are presented. The main strengths are: the bridging of the contextual environment with the design science activities and the rigorousness of testing IT artefacts. The main weaknesses are: imbalance in support for making contributions to both theory and practice, and ambiguity concerning the practitioners’ role in design and evaluation of artefacts. We claim that the identified weaknesses can be used for further development of frameworks or methods concerning design science research. 

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2016. Vol. 19, nr 3, s. 157-167
Nationell ämneskategori
Systemvetenskap, informationssystem och informatik
Forskningsämne
Handel och IT
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-11498OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-11498DiVA, id: diva2:1058940
Forskningsfinansiär
KK-stiftelsenTillgänglig från: 2016-12-21 Skapad: 2016-12-21 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-01-13Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Personposter BETA

Cronholm, StefanGöbel, Hannes

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Cronholm, StefanGöbel, Hannes
Av organisationen
Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT
I samma tidskrift
Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation
Systemvetenskap, informationssystem och informatik

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

urn-nbn
Totalt: 725 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf