Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Definitions, measurements and prevalence of fear of childbirth: a systematic review
Högskolan i Borås, Akademin för vård, arbetsliv och välfärd. University of Gothenburg.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-3195-5702
University of Gothenburg.
University of Gothenburg.
University of Gothenburg.
Vise andre og tillknytning
2018 (engelsk)Inngår i: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, ISSN 1471-2393, E-ISSN 1471-2393, Vol. 18, nr 1, artikkel-id 29329526Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Background

Fear of Childbirth (FOC) is a common problem affecting women’s health and wellbeing, and a common reason for requesting caesarean section. The aims of this review were to summarise published research on prevalence of FOC in childbearing women and how it is defined and measured during pregnancy and postpartum, and to search for useful measures of FOC, for research as well as for clinical settings.

Methods

Five bibliographic databases in March 2015 were searched for published research on FOC, using a protocol agreed a priori. The quality of selected studies was assessed independently by pairs of authors. Prevalence data, definitions and methods of measurement were extracted independently from each included study by pairs of authors. Finally, some of the country rates were combined and compared.

Results

In total, 12,188 citations were identified and screened by title and abstract; 11,698 were excluded and full-text of 490 assessed for analysis. Of these, 466 were excluded leaving 24 papers included in the review, presenting prevalence of FOC from nine countries in Europe, Australia, Canada and the United States. Various definitions and measurements of FOC were used. The most frequently-used scale was the W-DEQ with various cut-off points describing moderate, severe/intense and extreme/phobic fear. Different 3-, 4-, and 5/6 point scales and visual analogue scales were also used. Country rates (as measured by seven studies using W-DEQ with ≥85 cut-off point) varied from 6.3 to 14.8%, a significant difference (chi-square = 104.44, d.f. = 6, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Rates of severe FOC, measured in the same way, varied in different countries. Reasons why FOC might differ are unknown, and further research is necessary. Future studies on FOC should use the W-DEQ tool with a cut-off point of ≥85, or a more thoroughly tested version of the FOBS scale, or a three-point scale measurement of FOC using a single question as ‘Are you afraid about the birth?’ In this way, valid comparisons in research can be made. Moreover, validation of a clinical tool that is more focussed on FOC alone, and easier than the longer W-DEQ, for women to fill in and clinicians to administer, is required.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2018. Vol. 18, nr 1, artikkel-id 29329526
Emneord [en]
FOBS, Fear of childbirth, Prevalence, Request for caesarean section, Systematic review, W-DEQ
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Människan i vården
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-13554DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-1659-7ISI: 000422729400003PubMedID: 29329526Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85040361801OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-13554DiVA, id: diva2:1175082
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-01-17 Laget: 2018-01-17 Sist oppdatert: 2018-12-07

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(556 kB)36 nedlastinger
Filinformasjon
Fil FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstørrelse 556 kBChecksum SHA-512
77da0c87961f2adf649d7704968763c363168c0fc69b20e10ac02e14e027ad98ce8ebdcc766fe54cb6432a1c39573418d9c5d0d653691a46d0ca4aef1435e521
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMedScopus

Personposter BETA

Nilsson, Christina

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Nilsson, Christina
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 36 nedlastinger
Antall nedlastinger er summen av alle nedlastinger av alle fulltekster. Det kan for eksempel være tidligere versjoner som er ikke lenger tilgjengelige

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 208 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf